ArticleJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)2021
Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA in Root Perforation.
Article in Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dental Glass Ionomer Cement for Root Perforation Management: Physicochemical Characteristics and In Vitro Cell Response.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Comparative Apical Sealing Performance of Bioceramic and Resin-Based Sealers: A Fluid Filtration Analysis.Iranian endodontic journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Endodontic bioceramics: current and futurity aspects.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
- In vitro comparison of Enterococcus Faecalis survival in dentinal tubules following root canal therapy with AH plus, endoseal MTA, and cold ceramic sealers.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- A novel simplified approach for endodontic retrograde surgery in short single-rooted teeth.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Management of Maxillary Incisors With Middle-Third Root Perforation: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2024Article
- Bioceramics in Endodontics: Updates and Future Perspectives.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comparison of bacterial microleakage of three bioactive endodontic sealers in simulated underwater diving and aviation conditions.BMC oral health · 2021Article
- Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of EndoSeal MTA Versus MTA in Primary Tooth Pulpotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Contemporary clinical dentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
statement of the problemDifferent materials have been used to repair root perforations, the most successful of which is mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). It is technically difficult to use MTA for perforation repair. Recently, some bio-ceramic sealers such as Endoseal MTA were introduced to repair the perforation site during root filling, which decreases the technical difficulty of this procedure. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the bacterial microleakage of Pro-Root MTA and Endoseal MTA sealer in root perforation repair. MATERIALS AND
methodThis
resultsThere was no significant difference between the two experimental groups regarding bacterial microleakage (
conclusionUnder the conditions of this study, it can be concluded that the sealing ability of perforation repair with Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA was comparable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.