Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34150899›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2021

Oral Delivery of

Samiru S Wickramasuriya, Inkyung Park, Youngsub Lee, Woo H Kim, Chris Przybyszewski, Cyril G Gay, Jolieke G van Oosterwijk, Hyun S Lillehoj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. UnderstandingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Single or Combined Supplementation ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. EngineeredACS synthetic biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samiru S WickramasuriyaAnimal Bioscience and Biotechnology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Inkyung ParkAnimal Bioscience and Biotechnology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Youngsub LeeAnimal Bioscience and Biotechnology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Woo H KimAnimal Bioscience and Biotechnology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Chris PrzybyszewskiUS Biologic, Inc., Memphis, TN, United States.
Cyril G GayNational Program Staff-Animal Health, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Jolieke G van OosterwijkUS Biologic, Inc., Memphis, TN, United States.
Hyun S LillehojAnimal Bioscience and Biotechnology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chicken NK-lysin peptide 2 (cNK-2) is a natural lytic peptide with direct cytotoxicity against many apicomplexan parasites including

Indexed as

antimicrobial peptideBacillus subtilischickencoccidiosisgrowth performancegut healthNK-lysinoxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID34150899
PMCPMC8213023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.