Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34150875›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

Case Report: Assessing the Position of Pacemaker Leads

Andrea Simone Deichl, Philipp Lacour, Evgeny Belyavskiy, Burkert Pieske, Elisabeth Pieske-Kraigher, Florian Blaschke, Matthias Schneider

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea Simone DeichlDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Virchow-Klinikum), Berlin, Germany.
Philipp LacourDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Virchow-Klinikum), Berlin, Germany.
Evgeny BelyavskiyDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Virchow-Klinikum), Berlin, Germany.
Burkert PieskeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Virchow-Klinikum), Berlin, Germany.
Elisabeth Pieske-KraigherDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Virchow-Klinikum), Berlin, Germany.
Florian BlaschkeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Virchow-Klinikum), Berlin, Germany.
Matthias SchneiderDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Virchow-Klinikum), Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an association between presence of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) and development of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Mechanisms proposed to explain CIED-induced TR can be classified as implantation-related, lead-related, and pacing-related. Lead-related TR results from the direct interaction of the lead with the tricuspid valve (TV). The localization of the lead at the TV level directly influences the probability of subsequent development of significant TR. A transthoracic subcostal en face view of the TV can be acquired in most patients through a 90° rotation from the subcostal 4-chamber view with clear anatomic delineation of the TV and the commissures including lead position. This case-series presents three examples where the transthoracic en face view could add incremental information on the position of the pacemaker leads and on the mechanism of TR.

Indexed as

echocardiographyen-face imagingpacemakertricuspid regurgitationtricuspid valve

Identifiers

PMID34150875
PMCPMC8213207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.