ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
The PREgnancy and FERtility (PREFER) Study Investigating the Need for Ovarian Function and/or Fertility Preservation Strategies in Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02895165 (An Italian Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study on Fertility Preservation and Pregnancy Issues in Young Breast Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Italian Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study on Fertility Preservation and Pregnancy Issues in Young Breast Cancer Patients: PREgnancy and FERtilty (PREFER)
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety of pregnancy after breast cancer in young women with hormone receptor-positive disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESMO open · 2023Pooled it
- Safety of fertility preservation techniques before and after anticancer treatments in young women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022Pooled it
- Predicting ovarian function loss after chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy in young breast cancer patients.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Trial
- Long-Term Outcomes With Pharmacological Ovarian Suppression During Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Early Breast Cancer Patients.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Trial
- Fertility in breast cancer survivorship: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Fertility Preservation Pathways in Young Women With Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Analysis in a Publicly Funded System.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of fertility preservation counseling in women of reproductive age prior to gonadotoxic therapy.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Breast Cancer and Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation: SWOT Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Fertility and ovarian function preservation in young women with breast cancer: A joint analysis of the Joven & Fuerte and PREFER prospective studies.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Gonadotoxicity of immunotherapy and targeted agents in patients with cancer and impact on subsequent pregnancies.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Ex vivo oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation in an adolescent patient with recurrent ovarian dysgerminoma: a case report and review of the literature.F&S reports · 2025Article
- Fertility preservation in young patients with breast cancer: insights from the Gemme Dormienti network.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Balancing Fertility Preservation and Treatment Efficacy in (Neo)adjuvant Therapy for Adolescent and Young Adult Breast Cancer Patients: a Narrative Review.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Maximizing ovarian function and fertility following chemotherapy in premenopausal patients: Is there a role for ovarian suppression?Gynecologic oncology reports · 2024Review
- Prevalence and impact of fertility concerns in young women with breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Fertility preservation in Malaysian pediatric cohort: a survey of healthcare providers' knowledge, practice, attitude, perceptions and barriers.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 and collagen XVII endodomain expression in human cutaneous melanomas: can they serve as prognostic factors?Pathology oncology research : POR · 2024Article
- Pharmacological methods for ovarian function and fertility preservation in women with cancer: A literature review.Oncology research · 2024Review
- Breast Cancer and Fertility Preservation in Young Female Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Clinics and practice · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOffering ovarian function and/or fertility preservation strategies in premenopausal women with newly diagnosed breast cancer candidates to undergo chemotherapy is standard of care. However, few data are available on uptake and main reasons for refusing these options.
methodsThe PREFER study (NCT02895165) is an observational, prospective study enrolling premenopausal women with early breast cancer, aged between 18 and 45 years, candidates to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Primary objective is to collect information on acceptance rates and reasons for refusal of the proposed strategies for ovarian function and/or fertility preservation available in Italy.
resultsAt the study coordinating center, 223 patients were recruited between November 2012 and December 2020. Median age was 38 years (range 24 - 45 years) with 159 patients (71.3%) diagnosed at ≤40 years. Temporary ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) was accepted by 58 out of 64 (90.6%) patients aged 41-45 years and by 151 out of 159 (95.0%) of those aged ≤40 years. Among patients aged ≤40 years, 57 (35.8%) accepted to access the fertility unit to receive a complete oncofertility counseling and 29 (18.2%) accepted to undergo a cryopreservation technique. Main reasons for refusal were fear of delaying the initiation of antineoplastic treatments and contraindications to the procedure or lack of interest in future childbearing. Patients with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer had a tendency for a higher acceptance rates of ovarian function and/or fertility preservation strategies than those with hormone-receptor negative disease.
conclusionsMore than 90% of premenopausal women with early breast cancer, and particularly those with hormone receptor-positive disease, were concerned about the potential risk of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency and/or infertility and accepted GnRHa administration. Less than 1 out of 5 women aged ≤40 years accepted to undergo cryopreservation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.