Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34150661›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

The PREgnancy and FERtility (PREFER) Study Investigating the Need for Ovarian Function and/or Fertility Preservation Strategies in Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer.

Eva Blondeaux, Claudia Massarotti, Valeria Fontana, Francesca Poggio, Luca Arecco, Piero Fregatti, Claudia Bighin, Irene Giannubilo, Tommaso Ruelle, Maria Grazia Razeti and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02895165 (An Italian Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study on Fertility Preservation and Pregnancy Issues in Young Breast Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02895165 recruitingnot on this map

An Italian Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study on Fertility Preservation and Pregnancy Issues in Young Breast Cancer Patients: PREgnancy and FERtilty (PREFER)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, ItalyRan2012 to 2032Enrolled1,000ConditionsBreast Neoplasms, Pregnancy, Fertility Preservation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Fertility in breast cancer survivorship: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eva BlondeauxDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Claudia MassarottiPhysiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Valeria FontanaClinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Francesca PoggioBreast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Luca AreccoDepartment of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Piero FregattiU.O.C. Clinica di Chirurgia Senologica, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Claudia BighinU.O.C. Oncologia Medica 2, Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Irene GiannubiloBreast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Tommaso RuelleBreast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Maria Grazia RazetiDepartment of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Luca BoniClinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Paola AnseriniPhysiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Lucia Del MastroDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Matteo LambertiniDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOffering ovarian function and/or fertility preservation strategies in premenopausal women with newly diagnosed breast cancer candidates to undergo chemotherapy is standard of care. However, few data are available on uptake and main reasons for refusing these options.

methodsThe PREFER study (NCT02895165) is an observational, prospective study enrolling premenopausal women with early breast cancer, aged between 18 and 45 years, candidates to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Primary objective is to collect information on acceptance rates and reasons for refusal of the proposed strategies for ovarian function and/or fertility preservation available in Italy.

resultsAt the study coordinating center, 223 patients were recruited between November 2012 and December 2020. Median age was 38 years (range 24 - 45 years) with 159 patients (71.3%) diagnosed at ≤40 years. Temporary ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) was accepted by 58 out of 64 (90.6%) patients aged 41-45 years and by 151 out of 159 (95.0%) of those aged ≤40 years. Among patients aged ≤40 years, 57 (35.8%) accepted to access the fertility unit to receive a complete oncofertility counseling and 29 (18.2%) accepted to undergo a cryopreservation technique. Main reasons for refusal were fear of delaying the initiation of antineoplastic treatments and contraindications to the procedure or lack of interest in future childbearing. Patients with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer had a tendency for a higher acceptance rates of ovarian function and/or fertility preservation strategies than those with hormone-receptor negative disease.

conclusionsMore than 90% of premenopausal women with early breast cancer, and particularly those with hormone receptor-positive disease, were concerned about the potential risk of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency and/or infertility and accepted GnRHa administration. Less than 1 out of 5 women aged ≤40 years accepted to undergo cryopreservation strategies.

Indexed as

breast cancerfertility preservationgonadotoxicitypremature ovarian insufficiencypremenopausal patients

Identifiers

PMID34150661
PMCPMC8210666
OpenAlexW3170236103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.