Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34150455›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2021

Consideration of Both Discriminated and Generalized Responding When Teaching Children with Autism Abduction Prevention Skills.

Megan A Levesque-Wolfe, Nicole M Rodriguez, Jessica J Niemeier-Beck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megan A Levesque-WolfeMunroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, NE 68198 Omaha, USA.
Nicole M RodriguezMunroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, NE 68198 Omaha, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6786-0329
Jessica J Niemeier-BeckMunroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, NE 68198 Omaha, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We taught three children with autism how to respond to abduction lures presented by strangers. We then tested undesirable generalization of the safety response to matched instructions to leave by a familiar adult. Following training, all three participants engaged in the safety response across both strangers and familiar adults. Thus, we evaluated a set of procedures for establishing discriminated responding. Appropriate responding to instructions to leave by strangers versus familiar adults was achieved only after discrimination training. Discriminated responding occurred across a novel setting and maintained across 3 months; however, performance during stimulus generalization probes within community settings was variable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-020-00541-9.

Indexed as

AbductionBehavioral skills trainingIn situ trainingMultiple-exemplar training

Identifiers

PMID34150455
PMCPMC8149552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.