ReviewCureus2021
Prophylactic Antibiotics, the Mediator of Post-Stroke Infections: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbiota, systemic immunity, and extracellular vesicles in stroke: peripheral nodes as therapeutic leverage points.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
- New Directions in Infection-Associated Ischemic Stroke.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infections frequently complicate an acute stroke and have been associated with an unfavorable prognosis among patients. The use of prophylactic antibiotics seems rational, however, its efficacy has remained obscure. This systematic review aims to offer more clarity to this established dilemma. PubMed and Google Scholar were explored to gain access to studies on post-stroke infection. A systematic review was carried out to analyze how profitable it would be to offer preventive antibiotics immediately after an acute stroke. Five randomized control trials were obtained and analyzed the efficacy of antibiotics in acute stroke according to their intrinsic effects on the infection rate, functionality, and mortality benefits. Based on our findings, we discovered that antibiotics reduce the onset of early infections, especially urinary tract infections, but have absolutely no effect on the functionality and offer no mortality benefit. These results were emphatically shown in two large, open-labeled randomized controlled trials involved in this systematic review. Prophylactic antibiotics provide no additional benefits to the standard of care and should not be used following an acute stroke. They may decrease the incidence of acute infections, especially urinary tract infections, but have no effects on functional outcome and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.