Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34150378›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Presepsin as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Sepsis.

Dimitrios Velissaris, Nicholas Zareifopoulos, Vasileios Karamouzos, Evangelos Karanikolas, Charalampos Pierrakos, Ioanna Koniari, Menelaos Karanikolas

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Presepsin in Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Is GDF15 a Feasible Biomarker in Sepsis?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Biomarkers to guide sepsis management.Annals of intensive care · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Dimitrios VelissarisDepartment of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, GRC.
Nicholas ZareifopoulosDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Nikaia, Piraeus "Agios Panteleimon", Athens, GRC.
Vasileios KaramouzosIntensive Care Unit, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, GRC.
Evangelos KaranikolasDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, GRC.
Charalampos PierrakosIntensive Care Unit, Brugmann University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, BEL.
Ioanna KoniariDepartment of Electrophysiology and Device, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Menelaos KaranikolasDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.
General University Hospital of Patras · GRGeneral Hospital of Nikea · GRManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Patras · GRWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a condition characterized by high morbidity and mortality which is commonly encountered in an emergency and critical care setting. Despite a substantial body of research, the ideal biomarker for the diagnosis and prognostic stratification of septic patients remains unknown. This review aimed to summarize the publications referring to the validity of the biomarker presepsin when used for the detection, monitoring and prognosis in patients suffering with sepsis. This work is a narrative review based on a PubMed/Medline search conducted in order to identify all relevant publications referring to the use of presepsin in sepsis. Search was not limited by year of publication so all articles archived in the database would be retrieved. No article from before 2010 was identified. A total of 57 publications of the last decade were included, all of which support the use of presepsin as a biomarker for the assessment of septic patients. It has been used alone or in combination with commonly used biomarkers in the evaluation of patients with sepsis in settings such as the emergency department and the intensive care unit. It is useful in the initial workup of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency setting and may be a predictive factor of mortality and the most severe complication of sepsis. Presepsin seems to be a valuable tool for the laboratory workup of sepsis, especially when used in conjunction with other biomarkers and clinical rating scores with an established role in this population. Further research is needed to evaluate the clinical implications of utilizing presepsin measurements in the workup of sepsis.

Indexed as

cd14chronic renal diseasescrp levelsgram-negative bacteremialpsmortality rate in icuprocalcitoninsepsisshocksystemic inflammatory response syndrome

Identifiers

PMID34150378
PMCPMC8202808
OpenAlexW3160179389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.