ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2021
Evaluation methods for long-term reliability of polymer-based implantable biomedical devices.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of the Surgical Implantation and Fixation of an Implanted Middle Ear Microphone, the "UmboMic," in Cadaveric Sheep.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- Temporally Delayed Deployment of Photo-Responsive Liquid Crystal Polymer Networks Toward Neural Interfaces.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Progress in visible-light-activated photocatalytic coatings to combat implant-related infections: From mechanistic to translational roadmap.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Accelerated Aging Effect on the Stability of the 3D-Printed Biodegradable Implant for Bone Defect Repairs.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Ultra-Thin Flexible Encapsulating Materials for Soft Bio-Integrated Electronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Flexible Liquid Crystal Polymer Technologies from Microwave to Terahertz Frequencies.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term reliability of implantable biomedical devices is a critical issue for their practical usefulness and successful translation into clinical application. Reliability is particularly of great concern for recently demonstrated devices based on new materials typically relying on polymeric thin films and microfabrication process. While reliability testing protocol has been well-established for traditional metallic packages, common evaluation methods for polymer-based microdevices has yet to be agreed upon, even though various testing methods have been proposed. This article is aiming to summarize the evaluation methods on long-term reliability of emerging biomedical implants based on polymeric thin-films in terms of their theories and implementation with specific focus on difference from the traditional metallic packages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.