Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34150313›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

A machine learning model for multi-night actigraphic detection of chronic insomnia: development and validation of a pre-screening tool.

S Kusmakar, C Karmakar, Y Zhu, S Shelyag, S P A Drummond, J G Ellis, M Angelova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of using AI-enabled technology in sleep medicine: a commentary.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Modeling Sleep Quality Depending on Objective Actigraphic Indicators Based on Machine Learning Methods.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S KusmakarSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3125, Australia.
C KarmakarSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3125, Australia.
Y ZhuSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3125, Australia.
S ShelyagSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3125, Australia.
S P A DrummondTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
J G EllisDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
M AngelovaSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0931-0916
Deakin University · AUMonash University · AUNorthumbria University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a novel machine learning-based method for analysing multi-night actigraphy signals to objectively classify and differentiate nocturnal awakenings in individuals with chronic insomnia (CI) and their cohabiting healthy partners. We analysed nocturnal actigraphy signals from 40 cohabiting couples with one partner seeking treatment for insomnia. We extracted 12 time-domain dynamic and nonlinear features from the actigraphy signals to classify nocturnal awakenings in healthy individuals and those with CI. These features were then used to train two machine learning classifiers, random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM). An optimization algorithm that incorporated the predicted quality of each night for each individual was used to classify individuals into CI or healthy sleepers. Using the proposed actigraphic signal analysis technique, coupled with a rigorous leave-one-out validation approach, we achieved a classification accuracy of 80% (sensitivity: 76%, specificity: 82%) in classifying CI individuals and their healthy bed partners. The RF classifier (accuracy: 80%) showed a better performance than SVM (accuracy: 75%). Our approach to analysing the multi-night nocturnal actigraphy recordings provides a new method for screening individuals with CI, using wrist-actigraphy devices, facilitating home monitoring.

Indexed as

actigraphychronic insomniadynamical featuresmachine learningmulti-night recordingssleep

Identifiers

PMID34150313
PMCPMC8206690
OpenAlexW3169577992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.