Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34150312›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

Calibrating models of cancer invasion: parameter estimation using approximate Bayesian computation and gradient matching.

Yunchen Xiao, Len Thomas, Mark A J Chaplain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yunchen XiaoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9SS UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1297-7439
Len ThomasSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9SS UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7436-067X
Mark A J ChaplainSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9SS UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5727-2160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present two different methods to estimate parameters within a partial differential equation model of cancer invasion. The model describes the spatio-temporal evolution of three variables-tumour cell density, extracellular matrix density and matrix degrading enzyme concentration-in a one-dimensional tissue domain. The first method is a likelihood-free approach associated with approximate Bayesian computation; the second is a two-stage gradient matching method based on smoothing the data with a generalized additive model (GAM) and matching gradients from the GAM to those from the model. Both methods performed well on simulated data. To increase realism, additionally we tested the gradient matching scheme with simulated measurement error and found that the ability to estimate some model parameters deteriorated rapidly as measurement error increased.

Indexed as

approximate Bayesian computationBhattacharyya distancecancer invasiongeneralized additive modelsgradient matchingtumour cells

Identifiers

PMID34150312
PMCPMC8206694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.