ArticleJournal of environmental health science & engineering2021
Characterizing and modelling the sound absorption of the cellulose acetate fibers coming from cigarette butts.
Article in Journal of environmental health science & engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sound Absorption Modeling in Porous Materials: A Critical Review of Empirical, Equivalent-Fluid, Poroelastic, Resonant, and Numerical Methods.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Analysis of Some Empirical Equations for Modeling Sound Absorption of Porous Absorbers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Applications of Xylan Derivatives to Improve the Functional Properties of Cellulose Foams for Noise Insulation.Polymers · 2023Article
- Article
- Analysis of the Influence of Thickness and Density on Acoustic Absorption of Materials Made from Used Cigarette Butts.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Initial Conditioning of Used Cigarette Filters for Their Recycling as Acoustical Absorber Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work deals an experimental and theoretical research about the porous structure and the acoustic performance of cellulose acetate coming from the used cigarette filters. The porous structure was studied through the measurement and the prediction (using an inverse methodology) of some non-acoustic properties (bulk density, fiber size, porosity or flow resistivity and tortuosity). The sound absorption performance was evaluated by comparing experimental measurements using an impedance tube according to ISO 10534-2 with the best-fit approach obtained using some empirical models (Delany and Bazley, Garai-Pompoli, Komatsu and Miki). The accuracy of empirical models to obtain the flow resistivity was relatively high showing differences lower than 8% in the case of the Miki model or lower than 12% in the case of Delany & Bazley model. Regarding the absorption spectra, the errors found were lower than 9% for all the empirical models used in this work. These results showed that using relatively simple models such as empirical models were able to predict accurately the acoustic behaviour of the cellulose acetate. Finally, the sound absorption spectra obtained for cellulose acetate were compared with those obtained for fibrous materials currently used in building sector, suggesting that this fibrous waste could act as a possible substitute to traditional ones, due to the similar relatively high NRC values obtained for both type of fibrous absorber (NRC = 0.65).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.