ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The application of standardized nursing assessment and intervention in reducing the incidence of unplanned extubation of gastric tube.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reducing Inadvertent Gastric Tube Removal in NICU: A Quality Improvement Initiative.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- The Clinical Nursing Pathway on Prevention of Catheter Slippage with Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe goal of this study was to explore the application of standardized nursing assessment and intervention in reducing the incidence of unplanned extubation of gastric tube.
methods100 patients with indwelling gastric tube admitted to our hospital from November 2018 to November 2019 were recruited, and according to the order of admission, they were divided into an experimental group and a control group, with 50 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received routine care, while patients in the experimental group received standardized care. The clinical indicators, incidence of slipping of the catheter, nursing disputes, complications, pain relief time and swelling relief time, unplanned extubation of the gastric tube, nursing and patient satisfaction rate, and extubation time were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe rates of success intubation and indwelling compliance in experimental group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The experimental group exhibited smaller probability of catheter blockage compared with the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications was observed to be lower in the experimental group compared with the control group (P<0.05). We identified no statistical difference in catheter slippage and nursing disputes in the two groups (P>0.05). Regarding the 'nursing and patient satisfaction, the experimental group displayed significantly higher score in comparison with the control group (P<0.05). Furthermore, the extubation time, the pain relief time and swelling relief time in experimental group were found to be shorter (P<0.05). The unplanned gastric tube extubation rate of the experimental group was obviously lower than that of the control group's (P<0.05).
conclusionThe incidence of unplanned gastric extubation tube and occurrence of complications and unexpected situations of patients can be reduced significantly through standardized nursing evaluation and intervention, which should be widely promoted and adopted in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34150133PMC8205823W3174868113What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.