ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The clinical value of prenatal assessment of cervical length and placental thickness in pregnant women with placenta previa.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel approach for the early prediction and prevention of placenta accreta spectrum and severe peripartum hemorrhage in patients with complete placenta previa: leveraging three-dimensional placental topography, cervical length, and dilatation parameters on magnetic resonance imaging.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- The relationship between cervical length and area measurements evaluated by MRI and the amount of hemorrhage in PAS cases.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- The predictive value of thromboelastography, routine blood indices, ultrasound parameters, and placental thickness in determining fetal outcome.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was designed to investigate the clinical value of prenatal assessment of cervical length (CL) and placental thickness (PT) in pregnancy outcome and prognosis of pregnant women with placenta previa.
methodsEighty pregnant women with placenta previa treated in our hospital were enrolled for prenatal assessment of CL and PT, and were grouped as CL ≤ 30 mm (n=32) and CL > 30 mm (n=48) groups and PT ≥ 10 mm (n=34) and PT < 10 mm (n=46) groups, respectively. The pregnancy and perinatal outcomes were compared in different groups. ROC curve of CL and PT on preterm delivery was drawn, and the diagnostic value of CL and PT in diagnosing preterm delivery was calculated.
resultsThe pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of CL ≤ 30 mm group were significantly inferior to those of CL > 30 mm group (
conclusionPrenatal assessment of CL and PT has practical clinical significance for pregnant women with placenta previa, which helps in assessing pregnancy and perinatal outcomes and is worthy of clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34150123PMC8205795W3175407080What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.