ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The effect and prognosis of combinative implantation by autologous-fat granule and prosthesis for breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complications after autologous fat grafted into residual capsular sac after removal of breast prosthesis: Case reports.Heliyon · 2025Article
- A review of different breast reconstruction methods.American journal of translational research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn this study, we analyzed the effect and prognosis of combinative implantation of autologous-fat granule and prosthesis for breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy.
methods73 cases of breast cancer patients hospitalized from March 2015 to March 2017 were chosen and separated into observation group (n=41) and control group (n=32) on the basis of the surgical methods. Both the two groups underwent modified radical mastectomy. In addition, the control group received prosthesis implantation for breast reconstruction, and the observation group was implanted with combination of prosthesis and autologous-fat granule transplantation. Thereafter, the surgical indexes, postoperative complications, aesthetic effects of breast reconstruction and prognosis of the two groups of patients were evaluated.
resultsThe surgical duration of the observation group was obviously longer than that of the control group (
conclusionThe combinative implantation of both prosthesis and autologous-fat granule for breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy is simple in operation procedure, and has better aesthetic outcome and safety. It satisfies the aesthetic demand of patients while having lesions resection, and does not affect the surgical effect of modified radical mastectomy, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34150116PMC8205830W3174592850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.