ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The effects of comfort care on the recovery quality of oral and maxillofacial surgery patients undergoing general anesthesia.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative Anxiolytic and Sedative Effects of Intranasal Remimazolam and Dexmedetomidine: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study in Children Undergoing General Surgeries.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Trial
- Vomiting Management and Effect Prediction after Early Chemotherapy of Lung Cancer with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm and Comfort Care Intervention.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- The effect of eating lollipop at early stage of recovery after gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation: a randomized controlled trial.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the effects of comfort care on the recovery quality of oral and maxillofacial surgery patients undergoing general anesthesia.
methodsNinety-eight oral and maxillofacial surgery patients undergoing general anesthesia were recruited for this prospective study and were then randomly divided into two groups. The patients in the experimental group (49 cases) underwent comfort care, and the patients in the control group (49 cases) underwent routine care. Several indexes, including the hemodynamic indexes, the analgesic dosages, the recovery times, the extubation complications, the recovery room indwelling times, the related complications, and the final satisfaction scores were recorded and compared between the two groups.
resultsCompared with the control group, the analgesic dosages and the recovery times in the experimental group were largely decreased (P<0.05), the occurrences of cough reactions during extubation were strongly reduced (P<0.05), and the recovery room indwelling times were also effectively shortened (P<0.05). In addition, the patients' hemodynamics in the experimental group were more stable during the recovery period (P<0.05), and the other complications, except for incision dehiscence, were significantly reduced (P<0.05), and the patient satisfaction scores were also much higher in the experimental group than they were in the control group (P<0.05).
conclusionThe recovery times of oral and maxillofacial surgery patients undergoing general anesthesia were largely shortened, and the complications during the recovery period were effectively reduced with the help of the comfort care, so it is worthy of further research and clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34150085PMC8205744W3175722492What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.