ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
An implementation study of periarticular knee osteotomy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research progress on biodegradable polymer-based drug delivery systems for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Knee osteoarthritis: Current status and research progress in treatment (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the clinical effects of periarticular knee osteotomy (PKO) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
methodsA total of 180 patients with KOA admitted to our hospital were selected as the study subjects, and were divided into study group (90 cases) and control group (90 cases) in accordance with different intervention measures. The study group was treated with PKO, while the control group was treated with joint replacement. The perioperative indices, and postoperative pain degrees, knee joint function, quality of life, inflammatory factors and complications were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe control group was superior to the study group regarding the amount of preoperative bleeding, surgical duration, and incidence rate of complications, while the study group was superior to the control group regarding the long-term (over 2 years) knee joint function and quality of life (
conclusionPKO, exhibiting a high safety profile, can remarkably improve the joint pain symptoms, knee joint function, quality of life and symptoms of KOA in patients with KOA. Therefore, PKO is worthy of clinical promotion and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34150057PMC8205714W3176193988What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.