ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The value of AGR2 and KRT5 as an immunomarker combination in distinguishing lung squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- miR-34a-5p-mediated inhibition on the KRT5/DSP axis blunts cancer stem cell properties and cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- TRIM29 suppresses malignant progression in lung squamous cell carcinoma by shaping an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven proteomics classifier deciphers tumor origins of primary and metastatic squamous cell carcinomas.Biomarker research · 2026Article
- Agr2 in cancer and beyond: unraveling its role during protein synthesis, ER stress, and as a predictive biomarker.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Decoding the complexity: mechanistic insights into comorbidities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.The European respiratory journal · 2025Review
- Six-Gene Signature for Differential Diagnosis and Therapeutic Decisions in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer-A Validation Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Shared genetic factors and the interactions with fresh fruit intake contributes to four types squamous cell carcinomas.PloS one · 2024Article
- TRIM29 knockdown prevented the colon cancer progression through decreasing the ubiquitination levels of KRT5.Open life sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advancement of tumor subtype-specific treatments, precise histopathologic distinction between adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is of significant clinical importance. Nevertheless, the current markers are insufficiently precise in poorly differentiated tissue. This study aimed to establish a histology-specific immunomarker combination to subclassify non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) specimens. Based on previous work, we assessed the differential expression of anterior gradient 2 (AGR2) and keratin 5 (KRT5) in ADC and SCC by analyzing public datasets and postoperative specimens. Subsequently, we established a train set (n = 188) and a validation set (n = 42) comprised of NSCLC surgical specimens for training and verifying the subtype-identification capabilities of the two biomarkers separately and in combination, and contrasted the diagnostic utility of AGR2-KRT5 with that of the classic immunomarker combination, TTF1-P40. Differential expression of the two genes was statistically significant in ADC and SCC samples, both at the mRNA and protein levels. The specificity and sensitivity of AGR2 to detect ADC in the training set were 97.0% and 94.4%, while the sensitivity and specificity of KRT5 to determine SCC were 93.9% and 98.9%, respectively. The accuracies of AGR2-KRT5 in ADC, SCC, and across all samples were 93.3%, 92.0% and 92.6% respectively. In the validation cohort, the predictive accuracy of AGR2-KRT5 was up to 100% for ADC and 86.7% for SCC. Compared with TTF1-P40 in ADC samples, AGR2-KRT5 had 8.4% higher accuracy. In summary, the AGR2-KRT5 immunomarker combination reliably distinguished SCC from ADC, and was more accurate than TTF1-P40 in ADC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34150027PMC8205719W3173463082What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.