ArticleJournal of Cancer2021
Rapid multi-dynamic algorithm for gray image analysis of the stroma percentage on colorectal cancer.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A scoping review of TSR analysis in colorectal cancer: implications for automated solutions.Oncology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Serological signatures and pathological features for the management of CEA-negative colorectal cancer: development of combined diagnostic and prognostic nomograms.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Tumor‑stroma ratio as a clinical prognostic factor in colorectal carcinoma: A meta‑analysis of 7,934 patients.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- A predictive model and rapid multi-dynamic algorithm developed based on tumor-stroma percentage in gastric cancer: a retrospective, observational study.Gastroenterology report · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of the Individualized Prognostic Nomograms in Patients With Right- and Left-Sided Colon Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.