Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34149324›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiology2021

Simplified Assessment of the Index of Microvascular Resistance.

Monika Kodeboina, Sakura Nagumo, Daniel Munhoz, Jeroen Sonck, Niya Mileva, Emanuele Gallinoro, Alessandro Candreva, Takuya Mizukami, Frederik Van Durme, Alex Heyse and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reproducibility of bolus versus continuous thermodilution for assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with ANOCA.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Unveiling the Microvasculature: The Index of Microcirculatory Resistance and Its Expanding Role in Cardiovascular Care.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Invasive Endotyping of Angina Pectoris with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2025
    Review
  7. Impact of Procedural Differences on Bolus Thermodilution Method for Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Contemporary Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Monika KodeboinaCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Sakura NagumoCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Daniel MunhozCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8951-4504
Jeroen SonckCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Niya MilevaCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Emanuele GallinoroCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Alessandro CandrevaCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Takuya MizukamiCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Frederik Van DurmeCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Alex HeyseCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Eric WyffelsCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Marc VanderheydenCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Emanuele BarbatoCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Jozef BartunekCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Bernard De BruyneCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Carlos ColletCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0227-0082
Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital · BEAlexandrovska Hospital · BGShowa University · JPUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo validate a simplified invasive method for the calculation of the index of microvascular resistance (IMR).

methodsThis is a prospective, single-center study of patients with chronic coronary syndromes presenting with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. IMR was obtained using both intravenous (IV) adenosine and intracoronary (IC) papaverine. Each IMR measurement was obtained in duplicate. The primary objective was the agreement between IMR acquired using adenosine and papaverine. Secondary objectives include reproducibility of IMR and time required for the IMR measurement.

resultsOne hundred and sixteen IMR measurements were performed in 29 patients. The mean age was 68.8 ± 7.24 years, and 27.6% was diabetics. IMR values were similar between papaverine and adenosine (17.7 ± 7.26 and 20.1 ± 8.6,

conclusionIMR can be reliably measured using IC papaverine with similar results compared to intravenous infusion of adenosine with increased reproducibility and reduced procedural time. This approach simplifies the invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation in the catheterization laboratory.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationCoronary Artery DiseaseOperative TimeAgedCoronary CirculationCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMicrocirculationProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexVascular ResistanceWork Simplification

Identifiers

PMID34149324
PMCPMC8189791
OpenAlexW3172894521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.