Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34149302›Full record

ArticleMultimedia tools and applications2022

A study on the sentiments and psychology of twitter users during COVID-19 lockdown period.

Ishaani Priyadarshini, Pinaki Mohanty, Raghvendra Kumar, Rohit Sharma, Vikram Puri, Pradeep Kumar Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multimedia tools and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ishaani PriyadarshiniDepartment of Electrical and Computer Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA.
Pinaki MohantyDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, 610 Purdue Mall, West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
Raghvendra KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, GIET University, Gunupur, India.
Rohit SharmaDepartment of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, NCR Campus, Delhi- NCR Campus, Delhi-Meerut Road, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, UP India.
Vikram PuriCenter of Visualization and Simulation, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam.
Pradeep Kumar SinghABES Engineering College, Ghaziabad, UP India.ORCID 0000-0002-7676-9014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of the novel Coronavirus in late 2019 brought severe devastation to the world. The pandemic spread across the globe, infecting more than ten million people and disrupting several businesses. Although social distancing and the use of protective masks were suggested all over the world, the cases seem to rise, which led to worldwide lockdown in different phases. The rampant escalation in the number of cases, the global effects, and the lockdown may have a severe effect on the psychology of people. The emergency protocols implemented by the authorities also lead to increased use in the number of multimedia devices. Excessive use of such devices may also contribute to psychological disorders. Hence, hence it is necessary to analyze the state of mind of people during the lockdown. In this paper, we perform a sentiment analysis of Twitter data during the pandemic lockdown, i.e., two weeks and four weeks after the lockdown was imposed. Investigating the sentiments of people in the form of positive, negative, and neutral tweets would assist us in determining how people are dealing with the pandemic and its effects on a psychological level. Our study shows that the lockdown witnessed more number positive tweets globally on multiple datasets. This is indicative of the positivity and optimism based on the sentiments and psychology of Twitter users worldwide. The study will be effective in determining people's mental well-being and will also be useful in devising appropriate lockdown strategies and crisis management in the future.

Indexed as

Cognitive studyCoronavirusCOVID-19Human psychologyLockdownSentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID34149302
PMCPMC8200552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.