Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34149215›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2021

New Innovation: Use of Flash Glucose Monitoring for Evaluating Glycaemic Variability, Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Utility in Pregnant Women with Diabetes.

Saxena Pikee, Kumari Khushbu, Prakash Anupam, Puri Manju, Jain Sachin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saxena PikeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College & SSKH, New Delhi, 110017 India.ORCID 0000-0001-8199-3208
Kumari KhushbuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College & SSKH, New Delhi, 110017 India.
Prakash AnupamDepartment of Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College & SSKH, New Delhi, 110017 India.
Puri ManjuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College & SSKH, New Delhi, 110017 India.
Jain SachinDepartment of Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College & SSKH, New Delhi, 110017 India.
Lady Hardinge Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimApplication of Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system to evaluate glycaemic variability (GV), patient satisfaction and clinical utility in pregnant women with diabetes.

methodsThis prospective study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital on 70 pregnant women with diabetes where blood sugar levels were monitored by FGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).

resultsFGM generated 19,950 readings versus 1470 readings by SMBG over 3 days. Glucose values measured by FGM and SMBG had significant positive correlation (

conclusionThis is the first study to evaluate FGM for GV and patient satisfaction in women with GDM. Significant correlation was observed in glucose values by FGM and SMBG. FGM was more sensitive in detecting GV and hypoglycaemic excursions as compared to SMBG. All women preferred FGM over SMBG. Use of FGM gave new insights in clinical management of challenging cases.

Indexed as

Diabetes in pregnancyFGMGlycaemic variabilitySMBG

Identifiers

PMID34149215
PMCPMC8167017
OpenAlexW3120089778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.