ReviewJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2021
Ovarian Cancer Stem Cells: Newer Horizons.
Review in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glucosylceramide Synthase, a Key Enzyme in Sphingolipid Metabolism, Regulates Expression of Genes Accounting for Cancer Drug Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Potential of CD44, CD133, and VDR in Epithelial Ovarian Tumors: Association with Histopathology Parameters.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Identification of CD109 in the extracellular vesicles derived from ovarian cancer stem-like cells.BMB reports · 2024Article
- [SWI/SNF Complex Gene Mutations Promote the Liver Metastasis of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cells in NSI Mice].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2023Article
- Wnt antagonist as therapeutic targets in ovarian cancer.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2022Review
- ALDH1: A potential therapeutic target for cancer stem cells in solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ovarian cancer is one of the frequent cancers among women being diagnosed after cervical and breast cancer. The CA ovary is dreaded because even after successful treatment of the primary malignancy, the disease comes back and becomes resistant to conventional management. The prognosis in ovarian cancer management is mostly unsatisfactory, maybe because of the presence of ovarian cancer stem cells (OCSC). The hypothesis is that OCSC causes the recurrence of the ovarian malignancy. The OCSC can be identified by the presence of different markers and marker combinations. The assumptions are that CD44+, CD24+, CD117+, CD133+ and ALDH1+ could be the markers of ovarian cancer stem cells. The epithelial ovarian malignancy if proved as a stem cell disease, then it changes the entire management scenarios. Maybe, this will be the first step in managing the ovarian malignancy in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.