Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34149205›Full record

ArticlePlasma sources science & technology2020

Reproducibility of 'COST reference microplasma jets'.

F Riedel, J Golda, J Held, H L Davies, M W van der Woude, J Bredin, K Niemi, T Gans, V Schulz-von der Gathen, D O'Connell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plasma sources science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Foundations of plasma standards.Plasma sources science & technology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Reproducibility of 'COST reference microplasma jets'.Plasma sources science & technology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

F RiedelYork Plasma Institute, Department of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-262X
J GoldaInstitute of Experimental and Applied Physics, Kiel University, 24098 Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2344-2146
J HeldExperimental Physics II, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-7504
H L DaviesYork Plasma Institute, Department of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9016-9859
M W van der WoudeYork Biomedical Research Institute, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0446-8829
J BredinYork Plasma Institute, Department of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
K NiemiYork Plasma Institute, Department of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6134-1974
T GansYork Plasma Institute, Department of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1362-8000
V Schulz-von der GathenExperimental Physics II, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7182-3253
D O'ConnellYork Plasma Institute, Department of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1457-9004

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atmospheric pressure plasmas have been ground-breaking for plasma science and technologies, due to their significant application potential in many fields, including medicinal, biological, and environmental applications. This is predominantly due to their efficient production and delivery of chemically reactive species under ambient conditions. One of the challenges in progressing the field is comparing plasma sources and results across the community and the literature. To address this a reference plasma source was established during the 'biomedical applications of atmospheric pressure plasmas' EU COST Action MP1101. It is crucial that reference sources are reproducible. Here, we present the reproducibility and variance across multiple sources through examining various characteristics, including: absolute atomic oxygen densities, absolute ozone densities, electrical characteristics, optical emission spectroscopy, temperature measurements, and bactericidal activity. The measurements demonstrate that the tested COST jets are mainly reproducible within the intrinsic uncertainty of each measurement technique.

Indexed as

atmospheric pressure plasma jetbiomedical applications of plasmascapacitively coupled radio frequency dischargeCOST reference microplasma jetplasma medicinepower measurements

Identifiers

PMID34149205
PMCPMC8208597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.