ArticleScience scope (Washington, D.C.)
Instructional Scaffolding to Engage
Article in Science scope (Washington, D.C.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scaffolding Learning Via Multimodal STEM Text Sets for Students with Learning Disabilities.Learning disability quarterly : journal of the Division for Children with Learning Disabilities · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meeting the demands of the Next Generation Science Standards requires that students engage in complex science texts. However, for many students, including students with disabilities, this can be a challenging activity. Many students lack the necessary skills and background knowledge to successfully engage with complex science texts. In this article we discuss how to use instructional scaffolds to address gaps and challenges in reading as a way to engage all learners in complex science text.
Identifiers
34149164PMC8211112What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.