Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34148552›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

Mapping evidence on management of cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: scoping review protocol.

Petmore Zibako, Mbuzeleni Hlongwa, Nomsa Tsikai, Sarah Manyame, Themba G Ginindza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ovarian cancer presentation and management in sub-Saharan Africa: a scooping review protocal.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mapping Evidence on Management of Cervical Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Petmore ZibakoDiscipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2nd Floor George Campbell Building, Howard College Campus, Durban, 4041, South Africa. petmoreword@yahoo.com.
Mbuzeleni HlongwaDiscipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2nd Floor George Campbell Building, Howard College Campus, Durban, 4041, South Africa.
Nomsa TsikaiCollege of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, MP167, Zimbabwe.
Sarah ManyameCollege of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, MP167, Zimbabwe.
Themba G GinindzaDiscipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2nd Floor George Campbell Building, Howard College Campus, Durban, 4041, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer is a non-communicable disease and is the number 2 leading cause of death globally. Among all cancers, cervical cancer is the number 1 killer of women in low-income countries (LICs). Cervical cancer is a well understood preventable cancer. The rates of cervical cancer are very varied and inversely proportional to the effectiveness of disease management policies. Management of cervical cancer includes prevention, screening, diagnosis and treatment. The main objective of this scoping review is to map the evidence on cervical cancer management in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to understand the coverage of cervical cancer prevention and treatment services and provide an opportunity to generate knowledge on the risk factors, attitudes and practices extendable globally. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will be guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework recommended for conducting scoping review studies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Scr) checklist will also be completed to ensure that the review adheres to the sound methodological rigour acceptable for scoping review studies. The following electronic databases will be searched for potentially eligible articles: PubMed, Ebsco Host, Scopus and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Study screening procedures recommended by Higgins and Deeks will be followed. A narrative synthesis will be used, with data synthesised and interpreted using sifting, charting and sorting based on themes and key issues. DISCUSSION: Cervical cancer can become a disease of the past with a proper control strategy in place. It is therefore imperative to map available evidence on the management of cervical cancer to inform policy and advocacy action. More knowledge on the status quo will guide policymakers in ensuring cancer management guiding policies are formulated/updated/revised accordingly. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Not registered with PROSPERO (not needed). PROTOCOL AND REGISTRATION: This scoping review was not registered.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAfrica South of the SaharaDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPovertyScoping Reviews as TopicCervical cancer managementChemotherapyControlDiagnosisHPV vaccinepreventionRadiotherapyScreeningSub-Saharan AfricaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID34148552
PMCPMC8215748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.