Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34148547›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

Digital technologies to support people living with dementia in the care home setting to engage in meaningful occupations: protocol for a scoping review.

Nicholas Luscombe, Sarah Morgan-Trimmer, Sharon Savage, Louise Allan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas LuscombeThe Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health (REACH), University of Exeter Medical School, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. N.Luscombe@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5382-9256
Sarah Morgan-TrimmerInstitute of Health Research, College House, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Sharon SavageSchool of Psychology, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Louise AllanThe Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health (REACH), University of Exeter Medical School, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople living with all stages of dementia should have the opportunity to participate in meaningful occupations. For those living in care homes, this may not always occur and residents may spend significant parts of the day unengaged, especially those living with more advanced dementia. Digital technologies are increasingly being used in health care and could provide opportunities for people living with dementia (PLWD) in care homes to engage in meaningful occupations and support care staff to provide these activities. With technology advancing at a rapid rate, the objective of this scoping review is to provide an up-to-date systematic map of the research on the diverse range of digital technologies that support engagement in meaningful occupations. In particular, focus will be given to barriers and facilitators to inform future intervention design and implementation strategies, which have not yet been clearly mapped across the full range of these digital technologies.

methodA scoping review will be conducted to systematically search for published research using a comprehensive search strategy on thirteen databases. Published, peer-reviewed studies that focused on PLWD in the care home setting and assessed any form of digital technology that supported a meaningful occupation will be included. All methodologies which meet the criteria will be included. Data will be extracted and charted to report the range of digital technologies, underlying mechanisms of action, facilitators and barriers to implementation. DISCUSSION: Mapping the range of technologies to support PLWD to engage in meaningful occupations will identify gaps in research. The systematic search will include a diverse range of technologies such as software to enhance care planning, tablets devices, smartphones, communication robots and social media platforms, rather than focussing on a specific design or interface. This will enable comparison between mechanisms of action, barriers and facilitators to implementation which will be useful for future research and intervention design.

trial registrationOpen Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7UDM2.

Indexed as

DementiaDigital TechnologyCommunicationDelivery of Health CareHumansOccupationsScoping Reviews as TopicDigital interventionIsolationLong-term carePerson-centred careSocial connectednessSocial engagementTailored activities

Identifiers

PMID34148547
PMCPMC8214930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.