Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34148350›Full record

SynthesisDento maxillo facial radiology2022

Can gray values be converted to Hounsfield units? A systematic review.

Marjorie Eguren, Anderson Holguin, Karla Diaz, Jose Vidalon, Carlos Linan, Camila Pacheco-Pereira, Manuel Oscar Lagravere Vich

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marjorie EgurenMaster in Orthodontic Graduate Program, Faculty of Stomatology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
Anderson HolguinProgram of Orthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
Karla DiazStomatology Second Specialty, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Perú.
Jose VidalonDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Stomatology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
Carlos LinanDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
Camila Pacheco-PereiraUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Radiology, 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, Canada.
Manuel Oscar Lagravere VichUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Orthodontic Graduate Program, ECHA 5-524, 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this systematic review was to answer the focus question: "Could the gray values (GVs) from CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) be converted to Hounsfield units (HUs) in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)?"

methodsThe included studies try to answer the research question according to the PICO strategy. Studies were gathered by searching several electronic databases and partial grey literature up to January 2021 without language or time restrictions. The methodological assessment of the studies was performed using The Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) for

results2710 articles were obtained in Phase 1, and 623 citations remained after removing duplicates. Only three studies were included in this review using a two-phase selection process and after applying the eligibility criteria. All studies were methodologically acceptable, although in general terms with low risks of bias. There are some included studies with quite low and limited evidence estimations and recommendation forces; evidencing the need for clinical studies with diagnostic capacity to support its use.

conclusionsThis systematic review demonstrated that the GVs from CBCT cannot be converted to HUs due to the lack of clinical studies with diagnostic capacity to support its use. However, it is evidenced that three conversion steps (equipment calibration, prediction equation models, and a standard formula (converting GVs to HUs)) are needed to obtain pseudo Hounsfield values instead of only obtaining them from a regression or directly from the software.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyMultidetector Computed TomographyCalibrationHumansBone densityCone-beam computed tomographydiagnostic imagingHounsfield unitMultidetector Computed Tomographysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34148350
PMCPMC8693322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.