Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34148204›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2021

Using convolutional neural networks for tick image recognition - a preliminary exploration.

Oghenekaro Omodior, Mohammad R Saeedpour-Parizi, Md Khaledur Rahman, Ariful Azad, Keith Clay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identifying disease vector images in the Americas in the age of artificial intelligence.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oghenekaro OmodiorDepartment of Health & Wellness Design, School of Public Health, Indiana University, 1025 E. 7th Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. oomodior@indiana.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6918-1917
Mohammad R Saeedpour-PariziDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Md Khaledur RahmanDepartment of Computer Science, School of Informatics, Computer Science and Engineering, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Ariful AzadDepartment of Intelligent Systems Engineering, School of Informatics Computer Science and Engineering, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Keith ClayDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartphone cameras and digital devices are increasingly used in the capture of tick images by the public as citizen scientists, and rapid advances in deep learning and computer vision has enabled brand new image recognition models to be trained. However, there is currently no web-based or mobile application that supports automated classification of tick images. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a deep learning model pre-trained with millions of annotated images in Imagenet, against a shallow custom-build convolutional neural network (CNN) model for the classification of common hard ticks present in anthropic areas from northeastern USA. We created a dataset of approximately 2000 images of four tick species (Ixodes scapularis, Dermacentor variabilis, Amblyomma americanum and Haemaphysalis sp.), two sexes (male, female) and two life stages (adult, nymph). We used these tick images to train two separate CNN models - ResNet-50 and a simple shallow custom-built. We evaluated our models' performance on an independent subset of tick images not seen during training. Compared to the ResNet-50 model, the small shallow custom-built model had higher training (99.7%) and validation (99.1%) accuracies. When tested with new tick image data, the shallow custom-built model yielded higher mean prediction accuracy (80%), greater confidence of true detection (88.7%) and lower mean response time (3.64 s). These results demonstrate that, with limited data size for model training, a simple shallow custom-built CNN model has great prospects for use in the classification of common hard ticks present in anthropic areas from northeastern USA.

Indexed as

IxodesIxodidaeAmblyommaAnimalsFemaleMaleNeural Networks, ComputerNymphAmblyomma americanumConvolutional neural networkIxodes scapularisNortheastern United StatesTick-borne diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.