Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34148104›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2021

Single-molecule localisation microscopy: accounting for chance co-localisation between foci in bacterial cells.

Christoffer Åberg, Andrew Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christoffer ÅbergGroningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713AV, Groningen, The Netherlands. christoffer.aberg@rug.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-7239
Andrew RobinsonMolecular Horizons Institute and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3544-0976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using single-molecule fluorescence microscopes, individual biomolecules can be observed within live bacterial cells. Using differently coloured probes, physical associations between two different molecular species can be assessed through co-localisation measurements. However, bacterial cells are finite and small (~ 1 μm) relative to the resolution limit of optical microscopes (~ 0.25 μm). Furthermore, the images produced by optical microscopes are typically two-dimensional projections of three-dimensional objects. These limitations mean that a certain proportion of object pairs (molecules) will inevitably be assigned as being co-localised, even when they are distant at molecular distance scales (nm). What is this proportion? Here, we attack this problem, theoretically and computationally, by creating a model of the co-localisation expected purely due to chance. We thus consider a bacterial cell wherein objects are distributed at random and evaluate the co-localisation in a fashion that emulates an experimental analysis. We consider simplified geometries where we can most transparently investigate the effect of a finite size of the cell and the effect of probing a three-dimensional cell in only two dimensions. Coupling theory to simulations, we also study the co-localisation expected due to chance using parameters relevant to bacterial cells. Overall, we show that the co-localisation expected purely due to chance can be quite substantial and describe the parameters that it depends upon.

Indexed as

Single Molecule ImagingMicroscopy, FluorescenceBacterial cellsCo-localisationFluorescence microscopyPair distribution functionRadial distribution functionSingle-molecule experiments

Identifiers

PMID34148104
PMCPMC8448688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.