ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2021
Single-molecule localisation microscopy: accounting for chance co-localisation between foci in bacterial cells.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Closing the multichannel gap through computational reconstruction of interaction in super-resolution microscopy.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using single-molecule fluorescence microscopes, individual biomolecules can be observed within live bacterial cells. Using differently coloured probes, physical associations between two different molecular species can be assessed through co-localisation measurements. However, bacterial cells are finite and small (~ 1 μm) relative to the resolution limit of optical microscopes (~ 0.25 μm). Furthermore, the images produced by optical microscopes are typically two-dimensional projections of three-dimensional objects. These limitations mean that a certain proportion of object pairs (molecules) will inevitably be assigned as being co-localised, even when they are distant at molecular distance scales (nm). What is this proportion? Here, we attack this problem, theoretically and computationally, by creating a model of the co-localisation expected purely due to chance. We thus consider a bacterial cell wherein objects are distributed at random and evaluate the co-localisation in a fashion that emulates an experimental analysis. We consider simplified geometries where we can most transparently investigate the effect of a finite size of the cell and the effect of probing a three-dimensional cell in only two dimensions. Coupling theory to simulations, we also study the co-localisation expected due to chance using parameters relevant to bacterial cells. Overall, we show that the co-localisation expected purely due to chance can be quite substantial and describe the parameters that it depends upon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.