ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2021
Long-term outcome over a decade after first rib resection for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.
Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative Outcomes of Transaxillary First Rib Resection with Anterior Scalenotomy for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: An Ambispective Multimodal Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome: a review of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- 17 years' experience of surgical management of thoracic outlet syndrome at a district general hospital.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2024Review
- Long-term outcomes of transaxillary versus video-assisted first rib resection for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim was to determine long-term outcomes over a decade after first rib resection (FRR) in patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS). A secondary aim was to investigate correlation of residual rib stump with long-term symptoms.
methodsThis ambispective cohort included patients who underwent transaxillary FRRs for NTOS between 1998 and 2007. Short-term outcomes at 3-month clinical follow-up were retrospectively collected from medical records. Patients who agreed to participate in the study were invited to a long-term clinical follow-up in 2019. Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score and Cervical Brachial Symptom Questionnaire were used. A chest X-ray limited to a clavicular projection was taken, and the length of the residual first rib was measured.
resultsTwenty patients {mean age 41.8 [standard deviation (SD): 10.3 years]} who underwent 27 FRRs participated in the study. The mean follow-up time was 14.9 (SD: 3.6) years. Excellent or good recovery was noted after 16 (59.3% of operated arms) operations in the short-term follow-up and 22 (81.5%) operations in the long-term follow-up. No reoperations were necessary for residual symptoms. The mean Cervical Brachial Symptom Questionnaire score was 26.7 (SD: 28.2) (maximum 120), and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score was 21.1 (SD: 18.4) (maximum 100) points. Twenty-six patients (96.3%) had a noticeable residual first rib stump. The mean length of the residual first rib was 28.9 (SD: 9.5) mm. More than 30-mm rib stump did not indicate a worse long-term outcome.
conclusionsThis study showed good long-term outcome without symptom recurrence after FRR for NTOS. In most patients, after surgery, quality of life and ability to work improved. Residual rib stump length was not associated with the treatment outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.