Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34148031›Full record

ArticleAging2021

Comprehensive signature analysis of drug metabolism differences in the White, Black and Asian prostate cancer patients.

Yang Liu, Jia-Wei Zhou, Cun-Dong Liu, Jian-Kun Yang, De-Ying Liao, Zhi-Jian Liang, Xiao Xie, Qi-Zhao Zhou, Kang-Yi Xue, Wen-Bing Guo and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Yang LiuDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Jia-Wei ZhouDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Cun-Dong LiuDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Jian-Kun YangDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
De-Ying LiaoDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Zhi-Jian LiangDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Xiao XieDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Qi-Zhao ZhouDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Kang-Yi XueDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Wen-Bing GuoDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Ming XiaDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Jun-Hao ZhouDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Ji-Ming BaoDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Cheng YangDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Hai-Feng DuanDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Hong-Yi WangDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Zhi-Peng HuangDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Shan-Chao ZhaoDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Ming-Kun ChenDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The drug response sensitivity and related prognosis of prostate cancer varied from races, while the original mechanism remains rarely understood. In this study, the comprehensive signature including transcriptomics, epigenome and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of 485 PCa cases- including 415 Whites, 58 Blacks and 12 Asians from the TCGA database were analyzed to investigate the drug metabolism differences between races. We found that Blacks and Whites had a more prominent drug metabolism, cytotoxic therapy resistance, and endocrine therapy resistance than Asians, while Whites were more prominent in drug metabolism, cytotoxic therapy resistance and endocrine therapy resistance than Blacks. Subsequently, the targeted regulation analysis indicated that the racial differences in cytotoxic therapy resistance, endocrine therapy resistance, might originate from drug metabolisms, and 19 drug metabolism-related core genes were confirmed in the multi-omics network for subsequent analysis. Furthermore, we verified that

Indexed as

Asian PeopleBlack or African AmericanWhite PeopleAntineoplastic AgentsArea Under CurveCell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpigenomeEthnicityGenomicsHumansInhibitory Concentration 50MaleMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProstatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsRNA, Messengercomprehensive signaturedrug metabolismdrug resistanceprostate cancerrace

Identifiers

PMID34148031
PMCPMC8266326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.