Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34147668›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2021

Effectiveness of different types of mask in aerosol dispersion in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Gokhan Tanisali, Ahmet Sozak, Abdul Samet Bulut, Tolga Ziya Sander, Ozlem Dogan, Çağdaş Dağ, Mehmet Gönen, Fusun Can, Hasan DeMirci, Onder Ergonul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gokhan TanisaliDepartment of Material Science and Engineering, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: htanisali@ku.edu.tr.
Ahmet SozakMicroelectronics, Guidance and Electro-Optics Business Sector, Optical and Optomechanical Design Department, Aselsan Inc., Ankara, Turkey.
Abdul Samet BulutMicroelectronics, Guidance and Electro-Optics Business Sector, Optical and Optomechanical Design Department, Aselsan Inc., Ankara, Turkey.
Tolga Ziya SanderMicroelectronics, Guidance and Electro-Optics Business Sector, Optical and Optomechanical Design Department, Aselsan Inc., Ankara, Turkey.
Ozlem DoganSchool of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey; Koç University İşBank Centre for Infectious Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey.
Çağdaş DağDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey; Nanofabrication and Nanocharacterization Centre for Scientific and Technological Advanced Research, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey; Koç University İşBank Centre for Infectious Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet GönenDepartment of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey; Koç University İşBank Centre for Infectious Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fusun CanSchool of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey; Koç University İşBank Centre for Infectious Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hasan DeMirciDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey; Stanford PULSE Institute, SLAC National Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA; Koç University İşBank Centre for Infectious Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey.
Onder ErgonulSchool of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey; Koç University İşBank Centre for Infectious Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: oergonul@ku.edu.tr.
Koç University · TRAselsan (Turkey) · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of different mask types in limiting the dispersal of coughed air.

methodThe Schlieren method with a single curved mirror was used in this study. Coughed air has a slightly higher temperature than ambient air, which generates a refractive index gradient. A curved mirror with a radius of curvature of 10 m and a diameter of 60 cm was used. The spread of the cough wavefront was investigated among five subjects wearing: (1) no mask; (2) a single surgical mask; (3) a double surgical mask; (4) a cloth mask; (5) a valveless N95 mask; and (6) a valved N95 mask.

resultsAll mask types reduced the size of the contaminated region significantly. The percentage reduction in the cross-sectional area of the contaminated region for the same mask types on different subjects revealed by normalized data suggests that the fit of a mask plays an important role.

conclusionsNo significant difference in the spread of coughed air was found between the use of a single surgical mask or a double surgical mask. Cloth masks may be effective, depending on the quality of the cloth. Valved N95 masks exclusively protect the user. The fit of a mask is an important factor to minimize the contaminated region.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AerosolsCoughHumansMasksAerosolsAerosol dispersionCOVID-19Mask typesSARS-CoV-2Schlieren Imaging

Identifiers

PMID34147668
PMCPMC8325008
OpenAlexW3173836583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.