ArticleReproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)2021
The potential of mechanistic information organised within the AOP framework to increase regulatory uptake of the developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) in vitro battery of assays.
Article in Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Saccharopine and α-Aminoadipic Acid as Potential Biomarkers for Mitochondrial Stress in Neurons.Cells · 2026Article
- Challenges and solutions in transitioning to animal-free standards: a comprehensive analysis of components in human cell-based developmental neurotoxicity assays.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Dynamic culture of cerebral organoids using a pillar/perfusion plate for the assessment of developmental neurotoxicity.Biofabrication · 2024Article
- How neurobehavior and brain development in alternative whole-organism models can contribute to prediction of developmental neurotoxicity.Neurotoxicology · 2024Review
- Recent advances and current challenges of new approach methodologies in developmental and adult neurotoxicity testing.Archives of toxicology · 2024Review
- Dynamic culture of cerebral organoids using a pillar/perfusion plate for the assessment of developmental neurotoxicity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Comprehensive mapping of the AOP-Wiki database: identifying biological and disease gaps.Frontiers in toxicology · 2024Article
- Article
- New approach methodologies in human regulatory toxicology - Not if, but how and when!Environment international · 2023Review
- Effects of all-trans and 9-cis retinoic acid on differentiating human neural stem cells in vitro.Toxicology · 2023Article
- Advancing chemical safety assessment through an omics-based characterization of the test system-chemical interaction.Frontiers in toxicology · 2023Article
- Neuronal differentiation pathways and compound-induced developmental neurotoxicity in the human neural progenitor cell test (hNPT) revealed by RNA-seq.Chemosphere · 2022Article
- Effects of spike protein and toxin-like peptides found in COVID-19 patients on human 3D neuronal/glial model undergoing differentiation: Possible implications for SARS-CoV-2 impact on brain development.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Looking at Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing from the Perspective of an Invertebrate Embryo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Scientific Validation of Human Neurosphere Assays for Developmental Neurotoxicity Evaluation.Frontiers in toxicology · 2022Article
- Roadbumps at the Crossroads of Integrating Behavioral andFrontiers in toxicology · 2022Review
- From Causal Networks to Adverse Outcome Pathways: A Developmental Neurotoxicity Case Study.Frontiers in toxicology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A major challenge in regulatory developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) assessment is lack of toxicological information for many compounds. Therefore, the Test Guidelines programme of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) took the initiative to coordinate an international collaboration between diverse stakeholders to consider integration of alternative approaches towards improving the current chemical DNT testing. During the past few years, a series of workshops was organized during which a consensus was reached that incorporation of a DNT testing battery that relies on in vitro assays anchored to key neurodevelopmental processes should be developed. These key developmental processes include neural progenitor cell proliferation, neuronal and oligodendrocyte differentiation, neural cell migration, neurite outgrowth, synaptogenesis and neuronal network formation, as well key events identified in the existing Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs). AOPs deliver mechanistic information on the causal links between molecular initiating event, intermediate key events and an adverse outcome of regulatory concern, providing the biological context to facilitate development of Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA) for various regulatory purposes. Developing IATA case studies, using mechanistic information derived from AOPs, is expected to increase scientific confidence for the use of in vitro methods within an IATA, thereby facilitating regulatory uptake. This manuscript summarizes the current state of international efforts to enhance DNT testing by using an in vitro battery of assays focusing on the role of AOPs in informing the development of IATA for different regulatory purposes, aiming to deliver an OECD guidance document on use of in vitro DNT battery of assays that include in vitro data interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.