ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2021
Impact of COVID-19 on Cardiovascular Testing in the United States Versus the Rest of the World.
Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Updated Trends in Valvular Heart Disease-Related Heart Failure in G20-the Group of Twenty Countries: Insights From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiovascular Healthcare in Croatia: A Comprehensive Nationwide Survey.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Humoral Response following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-Based Vaccination in Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving Tailored Immunosuppressive Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular Testing in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Volume Recovery and Worldwide Comparison.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2023Article
- A cardiovascular risk model validated in Japan applied to an Italian cohort: Procedere con prudenza.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Health Care Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic for the Cardiovascular Practitioner.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2023Review
- Site-level variability in the processes of care and outcomes over time among patients with COVID-19 and myocardial injury: Insights from the American Heart Association's COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease Registry.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of diagnostic imaging examinations in the Brazilian unified healthcare system (SUS).Health policy and technology · 2023Article
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2023Review
- The Clinical Utility of Molecular Imaging in COVID-19: An Update.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Implementation of Blockchain Technology Could Increase Equity and Transparency in Organ Transplantation: A Narrative Review of an Emergent Tool.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023Review
- Best Practices on Radiology Department Workflow: Tips from the Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdown on an Italian University Hospital.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Confinement and Cardiovascular Diagnosis in a Pandemic Season: The Difficult Balance on the Razor's Edge.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological disease extent at FDG PET/CT staging: the ONCOVIPET study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Observational
- Editorial: Multimodality imaging in cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Oncology and cardiology positron emission tomography/computed tomography faced with COVID-19: A review of available literature data.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Bibliometric and visual analysis of cardiovascular diseases and COVID-19 research.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Cardiac Imaging on COVID-19 Pandemic Era: the Stand, The Lost, and Found.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2022Review
- Appropriateness and subsequent management of inpatient echocardiograms: An evaluation of low value care.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
36 authors at 20 institutions in 14 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study sought to quantify and compare the decline in volumes of cardiovascular procedures between the United States and non-U.S. institutions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the care of many non-COVID-19 illnesses. Reductions in diagnostic cardiovascular testing around the world have led to concerns over the implications of reduced testing for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality.
methodsData were submitted to the INCAPS-COVID (International Atomic Energy Agency Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19), a multinational registry comprising 909 institutions in 108 countries (including 155 facilities in 40 U.S. states), assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of diagnostic cardiovascular procedures. Data were obtained for April 2020 and compared with volumes of baseline procedures from March 2019. We compared laboratory characteristics, practices, and procedure volumes between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and between U.S. geographic regions and identified factors associated with volume reduction in the United States.
resultsReductions in the volumes of procedures in the United States were similar to those in non-U.S. facilities (68% vs. 63%, respectively; p = 0.237), although U.S. facilities reported greater reductions in invasive coronary angiography (69% vs. 53%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more U.S. facilities reported increased use of telehealth and patient screening measures than non-U.S. facilities, such as temperature checks, symptom screenings, and COVID-19 testing. Reductions in volumes of procedures differed between U.S. regions, with larger declines observed in the Northeast (76%) and Midwest (74%) than in the South (62%) and West (44%). Prevalence of COVID-19, staff redeployments, outpatient centers, and urban centers were associated with greater reductions in volume in U.S. facilities in a multivariable analysis.
conclusionsWe observed marked reductions in U.S. cardiovascular testing in the early phase of the pandemic and significant variability between U.S. regions. The association between reductions of volumes and COVID-19 prevalence in the United States highlighted the need for proactive efforts to maintain access to cardiovascular testing in areas most affected by outbreaks of COVID-19 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.