Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34147286›Full record

ArticleClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)2022

Myosteatosis predicting risk of transition to severe COVID-19 infection.

Xiaoping Yi, Haipeng Liu, Liping Zhu, Dongcui Wang, Fangfang Xie, Linbo Shi, Ji Mei, Xiaolong Jiang, Qiuhua Zeng, Pingfeng Hu and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Tracking Sarcopenia and Physical Activities Among Korean Adults Aged 50 Years and Older During COVID-19 Pandemic.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Xiaoping YiDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, PR China.
Haipeng LiuDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, PR China.
Liping ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, PR China.
Dongcui WangDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, PR China.
Fangfang XieDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, PR China.
Linbo ShiDepartment of Radiology, Yongzhou Central Hospital, Yongzhou, Hunan, 425006, PR China.
Ji MeiDepartment of Radiology, Changde Second People's Hospital, Changde, Hunan, 415001, PR China.
Xiaolong JiangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Nan Hua Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, 421002, PR China.
Qiuhua ZengDepartment of Radiology, Loudi Central Hospital, Loudi, Hunan, 417000, PR China.
Pingfeng HuDepartment of Radiology, Chenzhou Second People's Hospital, Chenzhou, Hunan, 423000, PR China.
Yihui LiDepartment of Radiology, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, Hunan, 412002, PR China.
Peipei PangGE Healthcare, Hangzhou, 310000, PR China.
Jie LiuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Nan Hua Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, 421002, PR China.
Wanxiang PengDepartment of Radiology, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, Hunan, 412002, PR China.
Harrison X BaiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Weihua LiaoDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, PR China; Molecular Imaging Research Center of Central South University, Changsha, 410008, PR China; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, 410008, PR China. Electronic address: Owenliao@csu.edu.cn.
Bihong T ChenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout 10-20% of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection progressed to severe illness within a week or so after initially diagnosed as mild infection. Identification of this subgroup of patients was crucial for early aggressive intervention to improve survival. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether computer tomography (CT) - derived measurements of body composition such as myosteatosis indicating fat deposition inside the muscles could be used to predict the risk of transition to severe illness in patients with initial diagnosis of mild COVID-19 infection.

methodsPatients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection presenting initially as having the mild common-subtype illness were retrospectively recruited between January 21, 2020 and February 19, 2020. CT-derived body composition measurements were obtained from the initial chest CT images at the level of the twelfth thoracic vertebra (T12) and were used to build models to predict the risk of transition. A myosteatosis nomogram was constructed using multivariate logistic regression incorporating both clinical variables and myosteatosis measurements. The performance of the prediction models was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve including the area under the curve (AUC). The performance of the nomogram was evaluated by discrimination, calibration curve, and decision curve.

resultsA total of 234 patients were included in this study. Thirty-one of the enrolled patients transitioned to severe illness. Myosteatosis measurements including SM-RA (skeletal muscle radiation attenuation) and SMFI (skeletal muscle fat index) score fitted with SMFI, age and gender, were significantly associated with risk of transition for both the training and validation cohorts (P < 0.01). The nomogram combining the SM-RA, SMFI score and clinical model improved prediction for the transition risk with an AUC of 0.85 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.95] for the training cohort and 0.84 [95% CI, 0.71 to 0.97] for the validation cohort, as compared to the nomogram of the clinical model with AUC of 0.75 and 0.74 for the training and validation cohorts respectively. Favorable clinical utility was observed using decision curve analysis.

conclusionWe found CT-derived measurements of thoracic myosteatosis to be associated with higher risk of transition to severe illness in patients affected by COVID-19 who presented initially as having the mild common-subtype infection. Our study showed the relevance of skeletal muscle examination in the overall assessment of disease progression and prognosis of patients with COVID-19 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19Area Under CurveHumansNomogramsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBody compositionCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MyosteatosisPredictive modelingTransition risk

Identifiers

PMID34147286
PMCPMC8180452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.