Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34147071›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Do psychological factors affect outcomes in musculoskeletal shoulder disorders? A systematic review.

Ali Sheikhzadeh, Maria M Wertli, Shira Schecter Weiner, Eva Rasmussen-Barr, Sherri Weiser

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07520721 (A Randomised, Multicentre, Prospective, Non-inferiority Clinical Study Analysing Outcomes of a Cemented Pegged Polyethylene Glenoid Component Versus a Hybrid Polyethylene and Trabecular Titanium Glenoid Component in Patients With Osteoarthritis Treated With an Anatomical SMR Stemless Shoulder Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07520721 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomised, Multicentre, Prospective, Non-inferiority Clinical Study Analysing Outcomes of a Cemented Pegged Polyethylene Glenoid Component Versus a Hybrid Polyethylene and Trabecular Titanium Glenoid Component in Patients With Osteoarthritis Treated With an Anatomical SMR Stemless Shoulder Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorSpaarne GasthuisRan2025 to 2036Enrolled94ConditionsGlenohumeral OsteoarthritisArmsAnatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with cemented all-polyethylene pegged glenoid, Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with hybrid trabecular titanium central-peg glenoid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Editorial: How to Make the Most of Open Notes.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ali SheikhzadehDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 63 Downing Street, New York, NY, 10014, USA. ali.sheikhzadeh@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7000-8866
Maria M WertliDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Shira Schecter WeinerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 63 Downing Street, New York, NY, 10014, USA.
Eva Rasmussen-BarrDepartment of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Huddinge, Sweden.
Sherri WeiserDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 63 Downing Street, New York, NY, 10014, USA.
Orthopedic Center · USKarolinska Institutet · SETouro College · USUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological factors may impact recovery in patients undergoing treatment for shoulder complaints. The aim of this review is to systematically analyse the evidence for the effect of modifiable psychological factors (MPF) on outcome, for patients with musculoskeletal shoulder disorders undergoing conservative or surgical treatment. MPF refers to factors that may change with intervention.

methodsThis is a systematic literature review. Five databases searched (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase and PsycInfo), for longitudinal studies investigating the influence of MPF on prognosis of patients with shoulder disorders, all diagnoses, undergoing clinical interventions (conservative or surgical). Level of evidence was determined using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology. Moderate and high quality evidence was included. We extracted all MPF, categorized constructs into the following domains: beliefs (self-efficacy, expectation of recovery), coping (catastrophizing, avoidant coping), and affect (depression, anxiety). We evaluated constructs for its predictive value of at least one outcome. Outcomes were informed by this review. Evidence was classified into three categories: evidence for, inconclusive evidence, and evidence against.

resultsOf 1170 references, 40 distinct publications based on 35 datasets were included (intervention type: 20 surgical; 20 conservative). Overall, 22 studies (20 cohort studies and 2 RCTs) were classified as high quality and 18 studies (16 cohort studies, 2 RCTs) were classified as moderate quality. Outcomes reported included pain, disability/function, perceived recovery, physical and mental health, and work status. Based on the review, of the psychological constructs explored, these data would suggest that expectation of recovery, catastrophizing, avoidant coping, depression, and anxiety may predict outcome for patients managed surgically. In patients undergoing conservative intervention the evidence was either against (catastrophizing, depression, anxiety) or inconclusive (self-efficacy, expectation of recovery, avoidant coping) for the predictive value of psychological factors on outcome.

conclusionsFive constructs were predictive of outcome for surgically managed patients. This suggests that implementing the biopsychosocial approach (i.e., preoperative screening, intervention by a trained clinician) may be advantageous for patients recommended for shoulder surgery,,. The same is not indicated for conservatively managed patients as no conclusive association of MPF with outcomes was noted. The importance of other MPF on outcome requires further investigation.

Indexed as

AnxietyShoulderAdaptation, PsychologicalCatastrophizationHumansMental HealthConservative interventionModifiable psychological factorsPredictorsSurgical interventionTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID34147071
PMCPMC8214793
OpenAlexW3125150385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.