Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34146954›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2021

Partnering for the major histocompatibility complex class II and antigenic determinant requires flexibility and chaperons.

Scheherazade Sadegh-Nasseri

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. PD-1 and CD73 on naive CD4Nature immunology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scheherazade Sadegh-NasseriDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: ssadegh@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Antigen Processing in the Secretory PathwayR37AI060040 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SADEGH-NASSERI, SCHEHERAZADE · 2012 to 2021
$4.2M
Immune Surveillance of Antigen Processing PathwayR01AI130210 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SADEGH-NASSERI, SCHEHERAZADE · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
Unconventional Sources of Peptides for Antigen PresentationR01AI121174 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SADEGH-NASSERI, SCHEHERAZADE · 2017 to 2022
$2.7M
Understanding the Impacts of HLA-DO in vivoR01AI120634 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SADEGH-NASSERI, SCHEHERAZADE · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI120634NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121174NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130210NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI060040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytotoxic, or helper T cells recognize antigen via T cell receptors (TCRs) that can see their target antigen as short sequences of peptides bound to the groove of proteins of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I, and class II respectively. For MHC class II epitope selection from exogenous pathogens or self-antigens, participation of several accessory proteins, molecular chaperons, processing enzymes within multiple vesicular compartments is necessary. A major contributing factor is the MHC class II structure itself that uniquely offers a dynamic and flexible groove essential for epitope selection. In this review, I have taken a historical perspective focusing on the flexibility of the MHC II molecules as the driving force in determinant selection and interactions with the accessory molecules in antigen processing, HLA-DM and HLA-DO.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationEpitopesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansMolecular ChaperonesEpitopesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIMolecular Chaperones

Identifiers

PMID34146954
PMCPMC8373735
OpenAlexW3171458272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.