Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34146473›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2021

Effectiveness of a killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Bangladesh: further follow-up of a cluster-randomised trial.

Mohammad Ali, Firdausi Qadri, Deok Ryun Kim, Md Taufiqul Islam, Justin Im, Faisal Ahmmed, Ashraful Islam Khan, K Zaman, Florian Marks, Jerome H Kim and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01339845 (Introduction of Cholera Vaccine in Bangladesh), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01339845 nacompletednot on this map

Introduction of Cholera Vaccine in Bangladesh: " Impact Evaluation of Cholera Vaccine and Behaviour Change Interventions in Urban Dhaka"

TypeinterventionalSponsorInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, BangladeshRan2009 to 2016Enrolled240,000ConditionsCholeraArmsShanChol, Vaccine and behaviour
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Oral killed cholera vaccines for preventing cholera.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dynamics of IgM and IgA Antibody Response Profile AgainstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Comprehensive Review on the Use of Oral Cholera Vaccine (OCV) in Ethiopia: 2019 to 2023.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohammad AliJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MA, USA.
Firdausi QadriInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Electronic address: fqadri@icddrb.org.
Deok Ryun KimInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Md Taufiqul IslamInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Justin ImInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Faisal AhmmedInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ashraful Islam KhanInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
K ZamanInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Florian MarksInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jerome H KimInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
John D ClemensInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh; UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDInternational Vaccine Institute · KRJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKilled whole-cell oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) are widely used for prevention of cholera in developing countries. However, few studies have evaluated the protection conferred by internationally recommended OCVs for durations beyond 2 years of follow-up.

methodsIn this study, we followed up the participants of a cluster-randomised controlled trial for 2 years after the end of the original trial. Originally, we had randomised 90 geographical clusters in Dhaka slums in Bangladesh in equal numbers (1:1:1) to a two-dose regimen of OCV alone (targeted to people aged 1 year or older), a two-dose regimen of OCV plus a water-sanitation-hygiene (WASH) intervention, or no intervention. There was no masking of group assignment. The WASH intervention conferred little additional protection to OCV and was discontinued at 2 years of follow-up. Surveillance for severe cholera was continued for 4 years. Because of the short duration and effect of the WASH intervention, we combined the two OCV intervention groups. The primary outcomes were OCV overall protection (protection of all members of the intervention clusters) and total protection (protection of individuals who got vaccinated in the intervention clusters) against severe cholera, which we assessed by multivariable survival models appropriate for cluster-randomised trials. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01339845.

findingsThe study was done between April 17, 2011, and Nov 1, 2015. 268 896 participants were present at the time of the first dose, with 188 206 in the intervention group and 80 690 in the control group. OCV coverage of the two groups receiving OCV was 66% (123 659 of 187 214 participants). During 4 years of follow-up, 441 first episodes of severe cholera were detected (243 episodes in the vaccinated groups and as 198 episodes in the unvaccinated group). Overall OCV protection was 36% (95% CI 19 to 49%) and total OCV protection was 46% (95% CI 32 to 58). Cumulative total vaccine protection was notably lower for people vaccinated before the age of 5 years (24%; -30 to 56) than for people vaccinated at age 5 years or older (49%; 35 to 60), although the differences in protection for the two age groups were not significant (p=0·3308). Total vaccine protection dropped notably (p=0·0115) after 3 years in children vaccinated at 1-4 years of age.

interpretationThese findings provide further evidence of long-term effectiveness of killed whole-cell OCV, and therefore further support for the use of killed whole-cell OCVs to control endemic cholera, but indicate that protection is shorter-lived in children vaccinated before the age of 5 years than in people vaccinated at the age of 5 years or older.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation. TRANSLATION: For the Bengali translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentBangladeshChildChild, PreschoolCholeraCholera VaccinesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMalePoverty AreasVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedVibrio choleraeCholera VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID34146473
PMCPMC9759785
OpenAlexW3169847309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.