Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2021
Effectiveness of a killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Bangladesh: further follow-up of a cluster-randomised trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01339845 (Introduction of Cholera Vaccine in Bangladesh), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Introduction of Cholera Vaccine in Bangladesh: " Impact Evaluation of Cholera Vaccine and Behaviour Change Interventions in Urban Dhaka"
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protection from killed whole-cell cholera vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet. Global health · 2025Pooled it
- Oral killed cholera vaccines for preventing cholera.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Co-administration of Oral Cholera Vaccine With Oral Polio Vaccine Among Bangladeshi Young Children: A Randomized Controlled Open Label Trial to Assess Interference.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Trial
- 5-Year effectiveness of an oral cholera vaccine in a cholera outbreak in rural Haiti: a case-control study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Genomic evolution and climate related drivers of cholera surges in Dhaka Bangladesh between 1996 and 2024.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- In-silico identification of anti-cholera phytochemicals from Indian medicinal plants.PloS one · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of a reactive oral cholera vaccination during a cholera outbreak at the Douala New-Bell Central Prison in Cameroon.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Dynamics of IgM and IgA Antibody Response Profile AgainstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of oral cholera vaccine (Euvichol-Plus) effectiveness againstBMJ global health · 2025Article
- Challenges with achieving and maintaining oral cholera vaccine coverage: insights from serial cross-sectional representative surveys in a cholera-endemic community in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Infectious disease research in forcibly displaced populations: A systematic review in low- and middle-income host countries.Journal of migration and health · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Review on the Use of Oral Cholera Vaccine (OCV) in Ethiopia: 2019 to 2023.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Review
- Effectiveness of one dose of killed oral cholera vaccine in an endemic community in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a matched case-control study.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Cholera Deaths During Outbreaks in Uvira, Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, 10-35 Months After Mass Vaccination.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Article
- Cost of oral cholera vaccine delivery in a mass immunization program for children in urban Bangladesh.Vaccine: X · 2022Article
- Epidemicity of cholera spread and the fate of infection control measures.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- Article
- Oral Cholera Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness.Vaccines · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKilled whole-cell oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) are widely used for prevention of cholera in developing countries. However, few studies have evaluated the protection conferred by internationally recommended OCVs for durations beyond 2 years of follow-up.
methodsIn this study, we followed up the participants of a cluster-randomised controlled trial for 2 years after the end of the original trial. Originally, we had randomised 90 geographical clusters in Dhaka slums in Bangladesh in equal numbers (1:1:1) to a two-dose regimen of OCV alone (targeted to people aged 1 year or older), a two-dose regimen of OCV plus a water-sanitation-hygiene (WASH) intervention, or no intervention. There was no masking of group assignment. The WASH intervention conferred little additional protection to OCV and was discontinued at 2 years of follow-up. Surveillance for severe cholera was continued for 4 years. Because of the short duration and effect of the WASH intervention, we combined the two OCV intervention groups. The primary outcomes were OCV overall protection (protection of all members of the intervention clusters) and total protection (protection of individuals who got vaccinated in the intervention clusters) against severe cholera, which we assessed by multivariable survival models appropriate for cluster-randomised trials. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01339845.
findingsThe study was done between April 17, 2011, and Nov 1, 2015. 268 896 participants were present at the time of the first dose, with 188 206 in the intervention group and 80 690 in the control group. OCV coverage of the two groups receiving OCV was 66% (123 659 of 187 214 participants). During 4 years of follow-up, 441 first episodes of severe cholera were detected (243 episodes in the vaccinated groups and as 198 episodes in the unvaccinated group). Overall OCV protection was 36% (95% CI 19 to 49%) and total OCV protection was 46% (95% CI 32 to 58). Cumulative total vaccine protection was notably lower for people vaccinated before the age of 5 years (24%; -30 to 56) than for people vaccinated at age 5 years or older (49%; 35 to 60), although the differences in protection for the two age groups were not significant (p=0·3308). Total vaccine protection dropped notably (p=0·0115) after 3 years in children vaccinated at 1-4 years of age.
interpretationThese findings provide further evidence of long-term effectiveness of killed whole-cell OCV, and therefore further support for the use of killed whole-cell OCVs to control endemic cholera, but indicate that protection is shorter-lived in children vaccinated before the age of 5 years than in people vaccinated at the age of 5 years or older.
fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation. TRANSLATION: For the Bengali translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.