Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34146176›Full record

ArticleOdontology2021

Factors influencing implant and prosthesis survival in zygomatic implant-supported fixed rehabilitation: a retrospective study.

Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan, Dalton Suzuki, Leandro Eduardo Kluppel, Camila Pereira Vianna, Waleska Caldas, Larissa Carvalho Trojan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luis Eduardo Marques PadovanIlapeo College, R. Jacarezinho, 656, Curitiba, PR, 80710-150, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0655-3100
Dalton SuzukiIlapeo College, R. Jacarezinho, 656, Curitiba, PR, 80710-150, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1491-3260
Leandro Eduardo KluppelIlapeo College, R. Jacarezinho, 656, Curitiba, PR, 80710-150, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0437-7211
Camila Pereira ViannaIlapeo College, R. Jacarezinho, 656, Curitiba, PR, 80710-150, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9638-2888
Waleska CaldasPrivate Practice, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3833-671X
Larissa Carvalho TrojanIlapeo College, R. Jacarezinho, 656, Curitiba, PR, 80710-150, Brazil. trojanlarissa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-7455
Centro Universitário Curitiba · BRLatin American Institute · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate mid-term implant and prosthesis survival in patients with edentulous atrophic maxillae submitted to zygomatic implant-supported fixed rehabilitation and to identify possible related risk factors.

methodsData were collected from records of patients with edentulous atrophic maxillae, in good general health and who were rehabilitated by means of acrylic resin full-arch screw-retained prosthesis supported by at least one zygomatic implant, between the years of 2006-2017. Implant and prosthesis survival rates were calculated. The association between implant and prosthesis loss and quantitative and qualitative variables of interest was verified with t tests and Fisher's exact tests, respectively. For the significant variables in the latter, odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were additionally calculated.

resultsThe sample comprised 66 patients in whom 171 zygomatic implants were placed to support maxillary screw-retained full-arch prostheses. Implant and prosthesis survival rates of 94.15% and 92.4%, respectively, were observed in a mean of 3.6 years of follow-up (up to 11.7 years). Implant loss was 4.33 more likely to occur when adverse events were recorded after the procedure of implant placement (P = 0.026) and 10.31 more likely to occur in implants that had their prosthesis repaired during follow-up visits (P = 0.004). Prosthesis loss was 22.00 times more likely to occur when implants were previously lost (P < 0.001). All prostheses that were considered as failures (i.e. were replaced) had been previously submitted to laboratory repair at some point during follow-up.

conclusionsZygomatic implant rehabilitation demonstrated to be a reliable method with good mid-term results. The occurrence of post-surgical adverse events and need for laboratory repair of the prosthesis were found to be significant risk factors for implant loss. Previous implant loss was significantly associated with prosthesis loss. These risk factors may be prevented by means of detailed planning of the rehabilitation to be carried out, including post-operative care of the patients, so that treatment success using zygomatic implants can be achieved.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsJaw, EdentulousDental Implantation, EndosseousDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedFollow-Up StudiesHumansProsthesis FailureRetrospective StudiesZygomaDental ImplantsAtrophyImplant lossMaxillaProsthesis failureRetrospective studyRisk factorsSurvival rateZygomatic implants

Identifiers

PMID34146176
OpenAlexW3165969023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.