Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34146117›Full record

Trial reportUrolithiasis2021

A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3).

Alina Reicherz, Hannah Westhues, Lorine Häuser, Patricia Wenzel, Joachim Noldus, Peter Bach

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Urolithiasis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alina ReicherzDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany. alina.reicherz@elisabethgruppe.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1587-4432
Hannah WesthuesDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
Lorine HäuserDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
Patricia WenzelDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
Joachim NoldusDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
Peter BachDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
Universitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the outcome of a short-term insertion of a mono-J catheter for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal to a conventional double-J catheter. This single-center academic study (Fast Track Stent study 3) evaluated stenting in 108 patients with urinary calculi after ureterorenoscopy. Patients were prospectively randomized into two study arms before primary ureterorenoscopy: (1) mono-J insertion for 6 h after ureterorenoscopy and (2) double-J insertion for 3-5 days after ureterorenoscopy. Study endpoints were stent-related symptoms assessed by an ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) and reintervention rates. Stone sizes and location, age, operation duration, BMI, and gender were recorded. Of 67 patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy, 36 patients were analyzed in the double-J arm and 31 patients in the mono-J arm. Mean operation time was 27.5 ± 1.3 min versus 24.0 ± 1.3 min, and stone size was 5.2 mm versus 4.5 mm for mono-J versus double-J, respectively (p = 0.06 and p = 0.15). FaST 3 was terminated early due to a high reintervention rate of 35.5% for the mono-J group and 16.7% for the double-J group (p = 0.27). One day after ureterorenoscopy, USSQ scores were similar between the study arms (Urinary Index: p = 0.09; Pain Index: p = 0.67). However, after 3-5 weeks, the Pain Index was significantly lower in those patients who had a double-J inserted after ureterorenoscopy (p = 0.04). Short-term insertion of mono-J post-ureterorenoscopy results in similar micturition symptoms and pain one day after ureterorenoscopy compared to double-J insertion. The reintervention rate was non-significant between the treatment groups most likely due to the early termination of the study (p = 0.27). Ethics approval/Trail Registration: No. 18-6435, 2018.

Indexed as

UreterUreteral CalculiUrinary CalculiHumansOperative TimeStentsTreatment OutcomeUreteroscopyDouble-JFlexible ureteroscopyTransient ureteral stenting using a mono-J ureteral catheterUreteroscopyUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID34146117
PMCPMC8560672
OpenAlexW3169837879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.