Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34146108›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

Fast numerical optimization for genome sequencing data in population biobanks.

Ruilin Li, Christopher Chang, Yosuke Tanigawa, Balasubramanian Narasimhan, Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, Manuel A Rivas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Computationally efficient whole-genome quantile regression at biobank scale.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruilin LiInstitute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5152-7086
Christopher ChangGrail, Inc, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Yosuke TanigawaDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9759-157X
Balasubramanian NarasimhanDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Trevor HastieDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Robert TibshiraniDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Manuel A RivasDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1457-9925
Stanford University · USMenlo School · US

Funding

New Statistical Methods for Medical Signals and ImagesR01EB001988 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSTONE, IAIN M · 2003 to 2018
$6.1M
Optimizing imputation for diverse populations in a distributed frameworkU01HG009080 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KENNY, EIMEAR ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2020
$5.2M
SOFTWARE FOR LARGE-SCALE INFERENCE OF THE GENETICS OF LIFESTYLE MEASURES, BIOMARKERS, AND COMMON AND RARE DISEASESR01HG010140 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KUNDAJE, ANSHUL, MONTGOMERY, STEPHEN · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010140NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009080NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationLarge-scale and high-dimensional genome sequencing data poses computational challenges. General-purpose optimization tools are usually not optimal in terms of computational and memory performance for genetic data.

resultsWe develop two efficient solvers for optimization problems arising from large-scale regularized regressions on millions of genetic variants sequenced from hundreds of thousands of individuals. These genetic variants are encoded by the values in the set {0,1,2,NA}. We take advantage of this fact and use two bits to represent each entry in a genetic matrix, which reduces memory requirement by a factor of 32 compared to a double precision floating point representation. Using this representation, we implemented an iteratively reweighted least square algorithm to solve Lasso regressions on genetic matrices, which we name snpnet-2.0. When the dataset contains many rare variants, the predictors can be encoded in a sparse matrix. We utilize the sparsity in the predictor matrix to further reduce memory requirement and computational speed. Our sparse genetic matrix implementation uses both the compact two-bit representation and a simplified version of compressed sparse block format so that matrix-vector multiplications can be effectively parallelized on multiple CPU cores. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this representation, we implement an accelerated proximal gradient method to solve group Lasso on these sparse genetic matrices. This solver is named sparse-snpnet, and will also be included as part of snpnet R package. Our implementation is able to solve Lasso and group Lasso, linear, logistic and Cox regression problems on sparse genetic matrices that contain 1 000 000 variants and almost 100 000 individuals within 10 min and using less than 32GB of memory. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/rivas-lab/snpnet/tree/compact.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksGenomeAlgorithmsChromosome MappingHumansLeast-Squares Analysis

Identifiers

PMID34146108
PMCPMC9206591
OpenAlexW3170394361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.