ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Fast numerical optimization for genome sequencing data in population biobanks.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- GeneSIS: enhancing transferability of polygenic scores with variant-level gene-by-sex interaction effects.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Computationally efficient whole-genome quantile regression at biobank scale.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Regenie.QRS: computationally efficient whole-genome quantile regression at biobank scale.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based polygenic scores enhance generalizability of psychiatric disorders prediction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Efficient storage and regression computation for population-scale genome sequencing studies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Efficient storage and regression computation for population-scale genome sequencing studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Hypometric genetics: Improved power in genetic discovery by incorporating quality control flags.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Tear Proteins Altered in Patients with Persistent Eye Pain after Refractive Surgery: Biomarker Candidate Discovery.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- A polygenic score method boosted by non-additive models.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Power of inclusion: Enhancing polygenic prediction with admixed individuals.American journal of human genetics · 2023Article
- Deep integrative models for large-scale human genomics.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Enhancing genomic mutation data storage optimization based on the compression of asymmetry of sparsity.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- A genome sequencing system for universal newborn screening, diagnosis, and precision medicine for severe genetic diseases.American journal of human genetics · 2022Review
- Construction and validation of prognostic prediction established on N6-methyladenosine related genes in cervical squamous cell carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2022Article
- Significant sparse polygenic risk scores across 813 traits in UK Biobank.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationLarge-scale and high-dimensional genome sequencing data poses computational challenges. General-purpose optimization tools are usually not optimal in terms of computational and memory performance for genetic data.
resultsWe develop two efficient solvers for optimization problems arising from large-scale regularized regressions on millions of genetic variants sequenced from hundreds of thousands of individuals. These genetic variants are encoded by the values in the set {0,1,2,NA}. We take advantage of this fact and use two bits to represent each entry in a genetic matrix, which reduces memory requirement by a factor of 32 compared to a double precision floating point representation. Using this representation, we implemented an iteratively reweighted least square algorithm to solve Lasso regressions on genetic matrices, which we name snpnet-2.0. When the dataset contains many rare variants, the predictors can be encoded in a sparse matrix. We utilize the sparsity in the predictor matrix to further reduce memory requirement and computational speed. Our sparse genetic matrix implementation uses both the compact two-bit representation and a simplified version of compressed sparse block format so that matrix-vector multiplications can be effectively parallelized on multiple CPU cores. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this representation, we implement an accelerated proximal gradient method to solve group Lasso on these sparse genetic matrices. This solver is named sparse-snpnet, and will also be included as part of snpnet R package. Our implementation is able to solve Lasso and group Lasso, linear, logistic and Cox regression problems on sparse genetic matrices that contain 1 000 000 variants and almost 100 000 individuals within 10 min and using less than 32GB of memory. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/rivas-lab/snpnet/tree/compact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.