Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34146041›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Tribal Odisha Eye Disease Study (TOES) Report # 9. Eye diseases and retinal disorders in an adult and elderly tribal community in Odisha, India - A community hospital-based study.

Srikanta Kumar Padhy, Vidhyadhar Akkulugari, Meenaketan Kandagori, Tapas Ranjan Padhi, Varsha M Rathi, Taraprasad Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Barriers and Enablers to Seeking Eye Care Among the Adult Indian Population: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Approach to inherited retinal diseases.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Srikanta Kumar PadhyVitreoretinal Services, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Vidhyadhar AkkulugariSrimati Kanuri Santhamma Center for Vitreoretinal Diseases, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Meenaketan KandagoriNaraindas Morbai, Budhrani Eye Centre and JK Centre for Tribal Eye Health, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Rayagada, Odisha, India.
Tapas Ranjan PadhiVitreoretinal Services, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Varsha M RathiGullapalli Pratibha Rao International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eye care, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Taraprasad DasSrimati Kanuri Santhamma Center for Vitreoretinal Diseases, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the proportion of people with major ophthalmic and retinal disorders in the tribal and non-tribal people presenting to a community eye hospital in an Indian state with a sizeable tribal population. Methods: Hospital-based cross-sectional retrospective study of all new adult patients, examined between September 2015 and June 2020. A tribal was defined as per the Indian ethnic classification. Blindness and visual impairment were defined as per the WHO standards. Diabetes and hypertension were defined as per Indian standards. The proportion of common ophthalmic and retinal disorders between the tribal and non-tribal community were compared. Results: This cohort consisted of 76,166 people (45.8%; n = 34,869, tribal); 39.4% (n = 29,989; non-tribal 23.6% and tribal 15.8%) people had ophthalmic disorders. In the examined people 2.3% were blind (higher in tribal community 4.7% versus 0.8%; P < 0.001) and 8.4% had moderate-to-severe visual impairment (higher in tribal community 14.4% versus 4.4%; P < 0.001). Refractive error (64.4%; higher in non-tribal community, 77.3% versus 44.6%, P < 0.001) and operable cataract (23.9%; higher in tribal community, 40.9% versus 11.8%, P < 0.001) were the principal ophthalmic disorders. Retinal disorders were higher in non-tribal people (5.9% vs. 2.9%; P < 0.001), but the tribal group had higher proportion of retinitis pigmentosa (20% vs. 6.4%; P < 0.001) and lower proportion of diabetic retinopathy (8% vs. 40.7%; P < 0.001). Conclusion: : The health-seeking behavior of the tribal community in India is low. A tribal person in India apparently visits the hospital when vision is grossly affected. It calls for greater advocacy, increased access to healthcare, and a larger population-based study.

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesHospitals, CommunityAdultAgedBlindnessCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIndiaPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityDiabetic retinopathyIndiaOdishaophthalmic disordersretinal diseasesretinitis pigmentosatribal community

Identifiers

PMID34146041
PMCPMC8374820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.