Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34146040›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Ten-year outcomes of uveal melanoma based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification in 1001 cases.

Carol L Shields, Eileen L Mayro, Zeynep Bas, Philip W Dockery, Antonio Yaghy, Sara E Lally, Arupa Ganguly, Jerry A Shields

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Interdependence of Molecular Lesions That Drive Uveal Melanoma Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Genetics of uveal melanoma -Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
  12. Conditional survival of uveal melanoma using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification (Simplified Version) in 1001 cases.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carol L ShieldsOcular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eileen L MayroOcular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Zeynep BasOcular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Philip W DockeryOcular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Antonio YaghyOcular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sara E LallyOcular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Arupa GangulyDepartment of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jerry A ShieldsOcular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Wills Eye Hospital · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To understand the prognostic value of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for uveal melanoma metastasis, using a simplified 4-category classification, based on tumor DNA. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 1001 eyes with uveal melanoma at a single center, categorized according to TCGA as Group A, B, C, or D (by fine-needle aspiration biopsy for DNA analysis), and treated with standard methods, was studied for melanoma-related metastasis at 5 and 10 years. Results: Of 1001 eyes with uveal melanoma, the TCGA categories included Group A (n = 486, 49%), B (n = 141, 14%), C (n = 260, 26%), and D (n = 114, 11%). By comparison, increasing category (A vs. B vs. C vs. D) was associated with features of older age at presentation (56.8 vs. 52.8 vs. 61.1 vs. 63.5 years, P < 0.001), less often visual acuity of 20/20-20/50 (80% vs. 67% vs. 70% vs. 65%, P = 0.001), tumor location further from the optic disc (P < 0.001) and foveola (P < 0.001), and greater median tumor basal diameter (10.0 vs. 13.0 vs. 14.0 vs. 16.0 mm, P < 0.001) and tumor thickness (3.5 vs. 5.2 vs. 6.0 vs. 7.1 mm, P < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier (5-year/10-year) rate of metastasis was 4%/6% for Group A, 12%/20% for Group B, 33%/49% for Group C, and 60%/not available for Group D. Conclusion: A simplified 4-category classification of uveal melanoma using TCGA, based on tumor DNA, is highly predictive of risk for metastatic disease.

Indexed as

MelanomaUveal NeoplasmsAgedHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesUveal MelanomaChoroidciliary bodycytogeneticsgeneticsmelanomaoutcomesTCGAThe Cancer Genome Atlasuvea

Identifiers

PMID34146040
PMCPMC8374755
OpenAlexW3166521600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.