ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2021
Comparison of anterior single- and standard two-portal techniques in arthroscopic Bankart repair.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Arthroscopic Bankart repair using a single anterior working portal technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International orthopaedics · 2024Pooled it
- Traumatic 270° and 360° labral tears of shoulder - Injury patterns, surgical technique, and mid-term outcomes.Shoulder & elbow · 2026Article
- 1-year postoperative follow-up is adequate for arthroscopic Bankart repair: a comparison between 1-year and 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcome scores.JSES international · 2025Article
- A Technique to Augment Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With or Without a Metal Block: A Comparison.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using 1 Anterior Portal Has a Shorter Surgical Time and Comparable Clinical Results With the Standard 2-Portal Technique.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of second-generation all-suture anchors in labral tear arthroscopic repairs: prospective, multicenter, 1-year follow-up study.JSES international · 2024Article
- Single Working Portal Technique with 70-Degree Arthroscope for Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.Arthroscopy techniques · 2024Article
- Results of arthroscopic treatment for anteroinferior shoulder instability using a single anterior working portal using birdbeak.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Factors Affecting Outcomes in Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the anterior shoulder instability using ultrasound shear wave elastography.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing a single anterior portal or a standard two-portal arthroscopic procedure for Bankart repair. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween January 2015 and March 2018, a total of 71 consecutive patients (53 males and 18 females; mean age: 33.3±10.3 years; range, 17 to 56 years) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with a minimum two-year follow-up period were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to the arthroscopic technique used: single anterior portal group (Group 1, n=32) and standard two-portal group (Group 2, n=39). Demographic and surgical characteristics of the patients were recorded. Pre- and postoperative clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated using the external rotation degree, as well as Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Rating Scale, Constant-Murley Score (CMS), Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS), and Rowe scores. The clinical and functional outcomes and revision rates were compared between the groups.
resultsThe mean follow-up was 32.0±7.4 months in Group 1 and 38.0±13.4 months in Group 2 (p=0.222). Good-to-excellent postoperative functional and clinical outcomes were achieved in both groups at the final follow-up, compared to baseline (p<0.001 for all). No significant difference was observed in the postoperative outcomes including daily sports activity, VAS, ASES, UCLA Shoulder Rating Scale, CMS, OSIS, and Rowe scores, and external rotation restriction degrees between the groups (p=0.270, p=0.190, p=0.313, p=0.248, p=0.125, p=0.203, p=0.318, p=0.083, respectively). The operative time in Group 1 was significantly lower than that in Group 2 (60.3±8.3 vs. 71.4±7.2, respectively; p=0.001). Four patients (5.6%) experienced recurrent dislocation with no significant difference between the groups (p=0.622). No significant complications occurred in the peri- or postoperative period. Fifty-eight (81.7%) patients returned to their preoperative sports activity level. The mean time to return to sports was 7.2±1.7 months.
conclusionGood-to-excellent clinical and functional outcomes can be obtained after arthroscopic Bankart repair, regardless of the use of a single or two anterior working portals. However, the single-portal technique is associated with reduced the operative time, compared to two-portal technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.