ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2021
Orthopedics and 3D technology in Turkey: A preliminary report.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experimental study on the in vitro osteogenic and chondrogenic ability of fat stem cells combined with 3D-printed porous scaffolds.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Biomechanical comparison between custom-made enhanced triflange and quadri-flange acetabular components for the treatment of Paprosky IIIB acetabular bone defects.Bone & joint research · 2025Article
- Review
- Mechanism of Injury for Traumatic Mid-Foot Lisfranc Injuries: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Cureus · 2024Article
- Accuracy analysis of artificial intelligence-assisted three-dimensional preoperative planning in total hip replacement.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Article
- A brief introduction to medical image processing, designing and 3D printing for orthopedic surgeons.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Review
- Mid-term outcomes of hemipelvic allograft reconstruction after pelvic bone tumor resections.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the patient satisfaction of using a 3D printed medical casting in fracture treatment.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn this study, we present the use of case specific three-dimensional (3D) printed plastic models and custom-made acetabular implants in orthopedic surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween March 2018 and September 2020, surgeries were simulated using plastic models manufactured by 3D printers on the two patients with pilon fractures. Also, custom-made acetabular implants were used on two patients with an acetabular bone defect for the revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA).
resultsMore comfortable surgeries were experienced in pilon fractures using preoperative plastic models. Similarly, during the follow-up period, the patients that applied custom-made acetabular implants showed a fixed and well-positioning in radiographic examination. These patients did not experience any surgical complications and achieved an excellent recovery.
conclusionPreoperative surgical simulation with 3D printed models can increase the comfort of fracture surgeries. Also, custom-made 3D printed acetabular implants can perform an important task in patients treated with revision THA surgery due to severe acetabular defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.