Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34145796›Full record

Trial reportBrain and behavior2021

External validity of randomized clinical trial studying preventing depressive symptoms following acute coronary syndrome.

Michael Tvilling Madsen, Knud Juel, Erik Simonsen, Ismail Gögenur, Ann Dorthe Olsen Zwisler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02451293 (The Effect of MElatonin on Depression, Anxiety, CIrcadian and Sleep Disturbances in Patients After Acute Myocardial Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02451293 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

The Effect of MElatonin on Depression, Anxiety, CIrcadian and Sleep Disturbances in Patients After Acute Myocardial Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorZealand University HospitalRan2016 to 2018Enrolled252ConditionsDepression, Acute Coronary SyndromeArmsMelatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael Tvilling MadsenCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0652-123X
Knud JuelNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Erik SimonsenPsychiatric Research Unit, Slagelse, Denmark.
Ismail GögenurCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.
Ann Dorthe Olsen ZwislerREHPA - Danish Knowledge Center for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the current study was to quantitatively explore aspects of external validity, both researcher's choices (eligibility) and patient's choices (consent), of a recently conducted clinical trial.

methodsA cohesive comparison between the MEDACIS trial (NCT02451293) database and a national quality and research database was conducted. Comparisons between both participants and nonconsenting patients (patient consent) and participants and noneligible patients (researcher selection) were performed. Comparisons of outcomes were depressive and anxiety symptoms, demographics, and somatic or psychiatric comorbidity.

resultsNoneligible patients had significantly higher levels of depressive symptoms and anxiety and were older and more likely to suffer from unstable angina pectoris. Furthermore, noneligible patients were less likely to be married, had a lower educational level, used more medication, and had a higher frequency of comorbidity. Nonconsenting patients had significantly higher levels of depressive symptoms and anxiety and were older and more likely to be females compared to participants.

conclusionSignificant differences were present between noneligible patients and participants; however, more troublingly significant differences were shown between nonconsenting patients and participants. The presence of depressive symptoms and anxiety has a significant impact on patients' willingness to give informed consent in clinical trials in cardiology with a focus on psychological outcomes.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAnxietyAnxiety DisordersDepressionFemaleHumansMaleResearch Designacute coronary syndromedepressive symptoms and anxietyeligibilityexternal validityrandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID34145796
PMCPMC8413812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.