Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34145682›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2022

The Intestinal Gas Questionnaire (IGQ): Psychometric validation of a new instrument for measuring gas-related symptoms and their impact on daily life among general population and irritable bowel syndrome.

Martin Duracinsky, Sharon Archbold, Beatriz Lobo, Pascal Bessonneau, Frédérique Thonon, Javier Santos, Danila Guagnozzi, Nalin Payakachat, Benoit Coffin, Fernando Azpiroz and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Martin DuracinskyPatient-Centered Reported Outcomes, Paris-Diderot University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3901-2255
Sharon ArchboldNeurogastroenterology Unit, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Wythenshawe Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Beatriz LoboDigestive System Research Unit, Unitat de Fisiología i Fisiopatología Digestiva, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Pascal BessonneauPatient-Centered Reported Outcomes, Paris-Diderot University, Paris, France.
Frédérique ThononPatient-Centered Reported Outcomes, Paris-Diderot University, Paris, France.
Javier SantosDigestive System Research Unit, Unitat de Fisiología i Fisiopatología Digestiva, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Danila GuagnozziDigestive System Research Unit, Unitat de Fisiología i Fisiopatología Digestiva, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Nalin PayakachatDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Benoit CoffinGastroenterology Department, Louis-Mourier Hospital, AP-HP, Colombes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0606-4158
Fernando AzpirozDigestive System Research Unit, Unitat de Fisiología i Fisiopatología Digestiva, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7327-960X
Peter J WhorwellNeurogastroenterology Unit, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Wythenshawe Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5220-8474
Olivier ChassanyPatient-Centered Reported Outcomes, Paris-Diderot University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8361-5809
Délégation Paris 7 · FRUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Manchester · GBHôpital Louis-Mourier · FRUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGas-related symptoms (GRS) are common in the general population (GPop) and among patients with disorders of gut-brain interactions but there is no patient-reported outcome evaluating these symptoms and their impact on daily life. We have previously developed a 43-item intestinal gas questionnaire (IGQ). The aim of the present study is to perform a psychometric validation of this instrument.

methodsParticipants (119 from the GPop and 186 irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients) were recruited from 3 countries (UK, Spain, France). IBS patients fulfilled ROME IV criteria with an IBS severity score between 150 and 300. Participants completed the IGQ, the functional Digestive Disorders Quality of Life (FDDQL), and the EQ-5D. A subgroup (n = 90) repeated the IGQ completion after 7 days on paper or electronically.

resultsFrom the original IGQ questionnaire, 26 items were deleted because of poor performance. Confirmatory factorial analysis on the remaining 17 items (7 symptom and 10 impact items) yielded a 6-factor structure accounting for 67% of the variance for bloating (6 items), flatulence (3), belching (2), bad breath (2), stomach rumbling (2), and difficult gas evacuation (2). Global score (0-100) was worse among IBS vs GPop (40 ± 15 vs 33 ± 17; p = 0.0016). At the second visit, the intraclass correlation coefficient of IGQ scores was between 0.71 and 0.86 (n = 67) for test-retest reliability and 0.61-0.87 (n = 64) for equivalence between electronic and paper versions of IGQ.

conclusionThe IGQ available in paper and electronic versions in 3 languages is a robust instrument for capturing and measuring GRS and their impact on daily life.

Indexed as

Irritable Bowel SyndromeFlatulenceHumansPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesgas-related symptomsgeneral populationIBSpatient-reported outcomespsychometricsquality of life

Identifiers

PMID34145682
PMCPMC9285021
OpenAlexW3172479151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.