Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34145551›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2021

TLR3 agonists: RGC100, ARNAX, and poly-IC: a comparative review.

Asma Komal, Mamoona Noreen, Attalla F El-Kott

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Vaccine Adjuvants and Delivery Systems: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reprogramming tumor microenvironment via systemic delivery of TLR3 agonist and manganese nanoparticle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Asma Komal *Department of Zoology, The Women University Multan, Multan, Pakistan.
Mamoona Noreen *Department of Zoology, The Women University Multan, Multan, Pakistan. mamoona.noreen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4770-5839
Attalla F El-KottDepartment of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
The Women University Multan · PKDamanhour University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toll-like receptors 3 (TLR3) have been broadly studied among all TLRs over the last few decades together with its agonists due to their contribution to cancer regression. These agonists undeniably have some shared characteristics such as mimicking dsRNA but pathways through which they exhibit antitumor properties are relatively diverse. In this review, three widely studied agonists RGC100, ARNAX, and poly-IC are discussed along with their structural and physiochemical differences including the signaling cascades through which they exert their actions. Comparison has been made to identify the finest agonist with maximum effectivity and the least side effect profile.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsHumansPoly I-CRNAToll-Like Receptor 3Adjuvants, ImmunologicPoly I-CRGC100RNAToll-Like Receptor 3AgonistsARNAXPoly-ICRGC100TLR3Toll-like receptor

Identifiers

PMID34145551
PMCPMC8213534
OpenAlexW3171253184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.