Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34145424›Full record

ArticleHeredity2021

Single-step genomic prediction of Eucalyptus dunnii using different identity-by-descent and identity-by-state relationship matrices.

Esteban J Jurcic, Pamela V Villalba, Pablo S Pathauer, Dino A Palazzini, Gustavo P J Oberschelp, Leonel Harrand, Martín N Garcia, Natalia C Aguirre, Cintia V Acuña, María C Martínez and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Esteban J JurcicInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, Centro de Investigación en Recursos Naturales, Buenos Aires, Argentina. jurcic.esteban@inta.gob.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0881-1268
Pamela V VillalbaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pablo S PathauerInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, Centro de Investigación en Recursos Naturales, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Dino A PalazziniInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, Centro de Investigación en Recursos Naturales, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gustavo P J OberschelpInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concordia, Entre Ríos, Argentina.
Leonel HarrandInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concordia, Entre Ríos, Argentina.
Martín N GarciaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5760-986X
Natalia C AguirreConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1668-9530
Cintia V AcuñaInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABiMo), INTA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6658-4780
María C MartínezInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABiMo), INTA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5442-3012
Juan G RivasConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Esteban F CisnerosFacultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero, Santiago del Estero, Argentina.
Juan A LópezInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bella Vista, Corrientes, Argentina.
Susana N Marcucci PoltriInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABiMo), INTA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sebastián MunillaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2666-2566
Eduardo P CappaInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, Centro de Investigación en Recursos Naturales, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6234-2263

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection based on the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) approach is becoming an important tool in forest tree breeding. The quality of the variance components and the predictive ability of the estimated breeding values (GEBV) depends on how well marker-based genomic relationships describe the actual genetic relationships at unobserved causal loci. We investigated the performance of GEBV obtained when fitting models with genomic covariance matrices based on two identity-by-descent (IBD) and two identity-by-state (IBS) relationship measures. Multiple-trait multiple-site ssGBLUP models were fitted to diameter and stem straightness in five open-pollinated progeny trials of Eucalyptus dunnii, genotyped using the EUChip60K. We also fitted the conventional ABLUP model with a pedigree-based covariance matrix. Estimated relationships from the IBD estimators displayed consistently lower standard deviations than those from the IBS approaches. Although ssGBLUP based in IBS estimators resulted in higher trait-site heritabilities, the gain in accuracy of the relationships using IBD estimators has resulted in higher predictive ability and lower bias of GEBV, especially for low-heritability trait-site. ssGBLUP based on IBS and IBD approaches performed considerably better than the traditional ABLUP. In summary, our results advocate the use of the ssGBLUP approach jointly with the IBD relationship matrix in open-pollinated forest tree evaluation.

Indexed as

EucalyptusGenomeGenomicsGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID34145424
PMCPMC8322403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.