ArticleScientific reports2021
Noninvasive assessment of endometrial fibrosis in patients with intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Field-of-View Optimized and Constrained Undistorted Single-Shot Study of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion for the Uterus and Cervix in Females of Childbearing Age and Postmenopause: A Prospective StudyCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Utility of dual-energy CT and advanced multiparametric MRI based imaging biomarkers of pancreatic fibrosis in grading the severity of chronic pancreatitis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Endometrial organoids: a reservoir of functional mitochondria for uterine repair.Theranostics · 2024Article
- Field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot study of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion-weighted imaging of the uterus during the menstrual cycle: a prospective study.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, few noninvasive methods have been reported to evaluate endometrial fibrosis. Our study was to investigate the feasibility of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MR imaging in the detection of endometrial fibrosis in patients with intrauterine injury. 30 patients with hysteroscopy-confirmed endometrial fibrosis and 28 healthy women were enrolled to undergo MR examination including the IVIM sequence. Endometrial thickness (ET); apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); and IVIM parameters, including pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*) and vascular fraction (f) were evaluated. A multivariable model combing ADC, D, and f values using binary logistic regression analysis was built to diagnose endometrial fibrosis. Endometrial fibrosis patients demonstrated lower endometrial ADC, D, f values and ET (all p < 0.05). The multivariable model, ADC, D, f values and ET performed well in diagnosing endometrial fibrosis with AUC of 0.979, 0.965, 0.920, 0.901 and 0.833, respectively. The multivariable model revealed a better diagnostic accuracy than D, f and ET (all p < 0.05). Although ADC achieved a better diagnostic value than ET (z = 2.082, p < 0.05), no difference in AUC was shown among ADC, D, and f (all p > 0.05); between ET and D (p > 0.05); and between ET and f (p > 0.05). The reproducibility of ADC, D, f and D* values in patients with endometrial fibrosis and healthy women were good to excellent (ICC: 0.614-0.951). IVIM parameters exhibit promising potential to serve as imaging biomarkers in the noninvasive assessment of endometrial fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.